The problem is really none of these things. It is that the qualification of inspectors is inadequate and not specified. The term “competent” is completely ridiculous, and this is being used as a cash for "competence" ie. logo arrangement by certain bodies. This is the thing that is “unsatisfactory”. Having a logo is then exploited by many, everything needs a new CU or complete rewire. There needs to be a complete split between inspection and reparations, the only way that some degree of honesty can be brought back. Conspiracy between that two groups should have a very severe penalty! The coding guide books should also be history, they simply encourage incompetence.
The problem is really none of these things. It is that the qualification of inspectors is inadequate and not specified. The term “competent” is completely ridiculous, and this is being used as a cash for "competence" ie. logo arrangement by certain bodies. This is the thing that is “unsatisfactory”. Having a logo is then exploited by many, everything needs a new CU or complete rewire. There needs to be a complete split between inspection and reparations, the only way that some degree of honesty can be brought back. Conspiracy between that two groups should have a very severe penalty! The coding guide books should also be history, they simply encourage incompetence.
