I suspect that from now on, by default, every inspection will have an ‘Unsatisfactory’ outcome as an ***-covering exercise. No one would dare pass an existing installation for fear of some ‘expert witness’ coming out of the woodwork to contradict their findings.
There should be no concern for a conscientious, competent inspector, rather gratification that chancers are being found out - Only one of many I fear.
The public is uniformed about the professional requirements needed or to check the qualifications of the employed individual, not the company! An inspector is an inspector at face value until found out!. Beware the bogey man! ?
I suspect that from now on, by default, every inspection will have an ‘Unsatisfactory’ outcome as an ***-covering exercise. No one would dare pass an existing installation for fear of some ‘expert witness’ coming out of the woodwork to contradict their findings.
There should be no concern for a conscientious, competent inspector, rather gratification that chancers are being found out - Only one of many I fear.
The public is uniformed about the professional requirements needed or to check the qualifications of the employed individual, not the company! An inspector is an inspector at face value until found out!. Beware the bogey man! ?
