Interesting that a lack of sleeving would render an installation ‘unsafe’, let alone non-compliant.
So does that mean that by default, all non-compliance's are ‘unsafe’?
Someone needs to do a rethink upon what they precisely mean for the definition of ‘Danger’ when it is used for the purpose defining wiring regulations non-compliance's.
Otherwise I can foreseen a situation whereby not a single existing installation can ever be compliant when examined by a third party who did not carry out the initial install.
Interesting that a lack of sleeving would render an installation ‘unsafe’, let alone non-compliant.
So does that mean that by default, all non-compliance's are ‘unsafe’?
Someone needs to do a rethink upon what they precisely mean for the definition of ‘Danger’ when it is used for the purpose defining wiring regulations non-compliance's.
Otherwise I can foreseen a situation whereby not a single existing installation can ever be compliant when examined by a third party who did not carry out the initial install.
