So, BOD, are you saying that any non-RCD protected circuit with cables in walls is a C2?
The Inspector is tasked with compiling an EICR with regard to the requirements of the 18th.
I imagine that there is quite a disclaimer in the front of any Coding Guide making it the EICR signatory's decision as to what Code to classify any observation.
The requirement in 522.6.202 to 204 for suitable cable/depth/RCD is not an 18th requirement having been a requirement for quite some time now.
As I've posted many times before, sooner or later something that was acceptable at the time becomes unsatisfactory.
When gripping the bar having given a C3 that led to a court case, do you think the Coding Code compilers or any others on here declaring themselves experts would be so vocal in defending you?
So, BOD, are you saying that any non-RCD protected circuit with cables in walls is a C2?
The Inspector is tasked with compiling an EICR with regard to the requirements of the 18th.
I imagine that there is quite a disclaimer in the front of any Coding Guide making it the EICR signatory's decision as to what Code to classify any observation.
The requirement in 522.6.202 to 204 for suitable cable/depth/RCD is not an 18th requirement having been a requirement for quite some time now.
As I've posted many times before, sooner or later something that was acceptable at the time becomes unsatisfactory.
When gripping the bar having given a C3 that led to a court case, do you think the Coding Code compilers or any others on here declaring themselves experts would be so vocal in defending you?
