As always. Tom, you love to deliberately misunderstand a statement, don't you? ??
The current version of the 2391 is NOT a rigorous assessment of competence. The multi-guess questions are predictable and pretty widely known and most people taking the exam, despite having exactly ZERO experience, pass it first time. It is, therefore, a poor indicator of actual knowledge.
How can you say I deliberately misunderstand a statement? What an idiot you are! I don't get involved with long posts' so how can that dribble, of a statement, be correct?
SO, now you can show me where I have ‘DELIBERATELY MISUNDERSTOOD A STATEMENT!' Where, if you're referring to my question to you, have I done this elsewhere, on this forum???
My question is… so what do you suggest instead of the 2391?
As always. Tom, you love to deliberately misunderstand a statement, don't you? ??
The current version of the 2391 is NOT a rigorous assessment of competence. The multi-guess questions are predictable and pretty widely known and most people taking the exam, despite having exactly ZERO experience, pass it first time. It is, therefore, a poor indicator of actual knowledge.
How can you say I deliberately misunderstand a statement? What an idiot you are! I don't get involved with long posts' so how can that dribble, of a statement, be correct?
SO, now you can show me where I have ‘DELIBERATELY MISUNDERSTOOD A STATEMENT!' Where, if you're referring to my question to you, have I done this elsewhere, on this forum???
My question is… so what do you suggest instead of the 2391?
