This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Inspection & Testing

I am a project manager, constructing new waste water treatment works, for a water company. The contractor building the new works has provided a program which has 4 months between  part 1 (dead testing) and part 2 (live testing) of the NICIEC certification. In between these dates, the contractor will test and commission of the plant and equipment e.g. pumps, actuated valves, instrumentation, screens etc.

Would it be correct to say, this does not comply with the wiring regulations ? 

Parents
  • I presume the IET “Committee” which reviews and updates the wiring regulations, are available to make comment  / ruling on issues such as this ?

    Not normal to get anything formal or binding - after all the wiring regulations are not law. But if it all goes wrong, having made a decent fist of following them helps justify your actions should it come to that …

    On here you will get the combined wisdom (?) of a number of folk who have an interest, some of whom feed into the committee process, others of whom, like me for example, have no formal ‘rank’ but do bring a few years (!) of problem solving to the table.

    It is considered very bad for things to be made live and used before they have been tested, and the folk doing the testing and 1st energisation are assumed skilled enough to recognise any malfunction or hazard that an ordinary person may not, and act accordingly (switch off, run away, call fire brigade, that sort of thing with escalating severity..)

    There needs to be a clear sequence so that everyone who is working on the part tested bits of the installation realises they are doing so and is suitably competent to handle any matters arising. 

    Or have some one there to complete the testing concurrently if in advance is not possible.

    Mike

     

Reply
  • I presume the IET “Committee” which reviews and updates the wiring regulations, are available to make comment  / ruling on issues such as this ?

    Not normal to get anything formal or binding - after all the wiring regulations are not law. But if it all goes wrong, having made a decent fist of following them helps justify your actions should it come to that …

    On here you will get the combined wisdom (?) of a number of folk who have an interest, some of whom feed into the committee process, others of whom, like me for example, have no formal ‘rank’ but do bring a few years (!) of problem solving to the table.

    It is considered very bad for things to be made live and used before they have been tested, and the folk doing the testing and 1st energisation are assumed skilled enough to recognise any malfunction or hazard that an ordinary person may not, and act accordingly (switch off, run away, call fire brigade, that sort of thing with escalating severity..)

    There needs to be a clear sequence so that everyone who is working on the part tested bits of the installation realises they are doing so and is suitably competent to handle any matters arising. 

    Or have some one there to complete the testing concurrently if in advance is not possible.

    Mike

     

Children
No Data