This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Farm TT quandary

I have been asked to replace the  existing damaged T&E switched supply to a light in a steel framed barn on a farm and extend the switched supply to two adjoining steel frame barns and put a flood light in each. 

The light supply and switch are in a nearby old brick built building, the main supply is three phase PME without any RCD protection and the barns are used to house cattle (approx 100) . The steel support posts (22) are set in concrete in holes dug into sandstone. The barn floors are concrete on sandstone and will have straw bedding on top which gets wet.

I am going to stick an RCD in the supply to the lights. TT ing the farm is not an option.

My quandary is what is the least risk option:

1- Ignore BS7671 and keep the metalwork isolated from the supply earth as at present due to the risk of step voltage in the event of a lost neutral. Recently a DNO contractor did manage to loose a phase while working on a supply pole, but the barn metalwork will be extraneous so not a compliant solution,

2- Treat the metalwork (22 support posts) as the TT earth with the risk of step voltage around the posts until the  RCD trips;

3- TT the barn lighting circuit with a separate earth. It will very very difficult  to get a Ra lower than the barn supports due to the sandstone around most of the farm so potential for step voltages again and problem of finding an accessible place away from animals;

4 Just bond everything to the PME earth, hope the number of posts reduces the step voltages around each to a low level and accept the risks, or

4 - Something else  I have not thought of ?

I would normally use SWA and there is a 8 metre catenary involved, can anyone  recommend a better alternative as it will be close to 30M across three barns. Even though I will be in a cage on a tele handler I am not keen on trying to install SWA along the roof beams over 20ft up if there is an easier option, I will be using girder clips to secure the cable.

  • Zoomup: 
     

    lyledunn: 
     

    Agree with option 2 but I think I would have at least 2 RCDs in series!

    Yes, the belt and braces approach is a good one.

    When younger I once carried out an experiment.

    I wired up a 3 Amp fuse in series with an earth rod in the back garden. There was no R.C.C.B. protection of any kind. I livened up the 3 Amp fuse at 240 Volts. The fuse promptly blew.

    The earth rod may have been close to a P.M.E. transformer and earthing rod, perhaps 15 meters away, I can not clearly remember. But the earth return was good and the fuse blew instantly.

    So a lighting circuit protected by  say a 6 Amp M.C.B. may well be safe and faults cleared quickly in case of a L to E fault.

    Perhaps the flood lights could be mounted on electrically insulating blocks of nylon to prevent a light to barn metal connection.

    Z.

     

     

    We discussed in a recent thread, the fact that RCDs are wholly unable to provide overcurrent protection (and unsuitable for that purpose) …. this scenario confirms that also. 

  • Quote. “We discussed in a recent thread, the fact that RCDs are wholly unable to provide overcurrent protection (and unsuitable for that purpose) …. ”

    Yes I knew that.

     

    Z.

  •   Adding in 0.1Ω for the L side gives a loop impednace of 4.6Ω. For Uo of 230V that's then an Earth Fault current of 230V/4.6Ω = 50

    So with a 50 Amp fault current, assuming a fault of negligible impedance the disconnection time of  a B6 M.C.B. will be 0.01 s or less.

    Z.

  • An electric fencer can produce about 8kV. But at a very low current, say 120mA typically. It does not harm cattle that come into contact with it.

    So, just what energy will a cow be subject to if it touches a live barn support, (one of 22) whilst the fault clears very quickly via the B6 M.C.B. and or R.C.D.(s)?

    Will the energy be at a safe level so as not to harm the animal?

    Z.

     

  • So, the big question is:

    How electrically conductive are cattle hooves? They do not have fleshy feet like us. Are they naturally insulated from Earth by the construction of their hooves? Cattle can have very wet noses that must be conductive, but their feet may be more insulating.

     

    Z.

     

  • I suspect that cow's hooves are similar to horses - hard hoof material around the sides but more fleshy in down the middle. Combined with the wet ‘organic material’ they tend to be stood in in and around farm buildings, I wouldn't have thought we could rely on much in the way of insulating properties.

    There are well documented cases of cattle refusing to enter farm buildings or milking stalls due to a small voltage difference (usually PME related) - they're certainly more sensitive than humans to that sort of situation. How long they can withstand a shock current before risking fatality however is quite a different question. I don't know, but being larger animals I might suspect they might be no worse than humans on that count.

       - Andy.

  • Thank you for all your comments, option 2 seems to be the favourite.  I will see if the farmer will splash out on two RCDs. The explanation of voltages on earthed metal, series/parallel resistances, is obvious when someone points it out?, my old aching remaining grey matter takes a long time to get up to speed these days. It looks like I will also be struggling with SWA at height and getting the BBB out for TT earth conductor sizes and working out whether I can use the armour as an earth conductor and the CPC  or will I need three cores? Given the small cost difference it will probably be three but I have not priced SWA in the last few months?.

    On all the other issues raised: 

    I did TT a different metal barn on the same farm a few years ago using the posts as earth, no livestock, and the Ze at the barn was less than 20 Ohm on 8 bonded posts.

    It was a dairy farm for many years but the farmer gave up on dairy a few years ago as it was not profitable and he was effectively paying to produce milk. Also the company who bought the milk would reject a days production with made up reasons very now and again. He now takes holidays as he is no longer tied to the farm 365 days a year.

    Interestingly there was no grid in the floor of the milking parlour, the supply was PME  and I did not see any Green or even G/Y bonding to the stall metalwork anywhere. The concrete was probably laid on the sandstone with no DPC and would always be wet form the washing down twice a day.

    The livestock may have insulating hooves when dry. But the bedding becomes wet and soiled within a day of being laid so for part of the time they are on wet bedding and have wet hooves. With the salts etc in urine I suspect they will be very conducting. 

    The farmer is a tenant and the landlord is responsible for the electrics in the rented buildings but the farmer is responsible for the buildings he has constructed and any additions he requires. The farm electrics had an unsatisfactory EICR last year. I am told the inspector was happy with the bits I had installed?.  The farmer  has not heard about what work or when any rectification work will be done . 

    Kevin

  • kfh: 
     

    Thank you for all your comments, option 2 seems to be the favourite.  I will see if the farmer will splash out on two RCDs. The explanation of voltages on earthed metal, series/parallel resistances, is obvious when someone points it out?, my old aching remaining grey matter takes a long time to get up to speed these days. It looks like I will also be struggling with SWA at height and getting the BBB out for TT earth conductor sizes and working out whether I can use the armour as an earth conductor and the CPC  or will I need three cores? Given the small cost difference it will probably be three but I have not priced SWA in the last few months?.

    On all the other issues raised: 

    I did TT a different metal barn on the same farm a few years ago using the posts as earth, no livestock, and the Ze at the barn was less than 20 Ohm on 8 bonded posts.

    It was a dairy farm for many years but the farmer gave up on dairy a few years ago as it was not profitable and he was effectively paying to produce milk. Also the company who bought the milk would reject a days production with made up reasons very now and again. He now takes holidays as he is no longer tied to the farm 365 days a year.

    Interestingly there was no grid in the floor of the milking parlour, the supply was PME  and I did not see any Green or even G/Y bonding to the stall metalwork anywhere. The concrete was probably laid on the sandstone with no DPC and would always be wet form the washing down twice a day.

    The livestock may have insulating hooves when dry. But the bedding becomes wet and soiled within a day of being laid so for part of the time they are on wet bedding and have wet hooves. With the salts etc in urine I suspect they will be very conducting. 

    The farmer is a tenant and the landlord is responsible for the electrics in the rented buildings but the farmer is responsible for the buildings he has constructed and any additions he requires. The farm electrics had an unsatisfactory EICR last year. I am told the inspector was happy with the bits I had installed?.  The farmer  has not heard about what work or when any rectification work will be done . 

    Kevin

    Thanks for the update Kevin. Don't forget to strap yourself to the cage when working at high level.

    Z.

  • Zoomup: 
    Thanks for the update Kevin. Don't forget to strap yourself to the cage when working at high level.

    That is with a full harness, lanyard, and hard hat; and not forgetting that powered access ticket. Frankly a cage on a telehandler sounds a bit dodgy, especially if you don't have control from the cage.

  • Chris Pearson: 
     

    Zoomup: 
    Thanks for the update Kevin. Don't forget to strap yourself to the cage when working at high level.

    That is with a full harness, lanyard, and hard hat; and not forgetting that powered access ticket. Frankly a cage on a telehandler sounds a bit dodgy, especially if you don't have control from the cage.

    This sort of thing Chris?