The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

The diversity of Diversity

Everyone seems to have a slightly different way of calculating Diversity for sockets. I've seen it done as 100% of 'the main' circuit rating plus 40% of each subsequent circuit. Another approach is 100% of the highest power appliance on each circuit plus 40% of all the other appliances. Either way, I end up with an unrealistically high value for my calculation.

I want one circuit for each of Kitchen, Utility, rest of GF, FF and attic. Each would be 32A and so the first approach makes for 32A + 40% x 4 x 32A = 83A. If I tot up appliances and include a possible portable heater or hair dryer in each of GF, FF and attic I end up with around 80A (no shower and not including the cooker). I'm using 2kW → 8.7A for the highest power appliance in each circuit (kettle in kitchen, iron or drier in utility, heater in GF, heater or hair drier in each of FF and loft). Those items alone come to 5 * 8.7A = 44A. Adding 40% of toaster, microwave, computers etc etc ramps things up quite a bit and when I did a list it totalled 80A for sockets, but the list isn't much more than I'd expect in a general house. I used quite high values for each appliance (e.g. toaster 1400W, Drier 2kW, Iron 2.8kW, vacuum cleaner 550W)

The lights are about 3A but the electric cooker adds 30A and so the total exceeds 100A. Am I being too conscientious?

Is it reasonable to ignore (the possibility of) portable heaters if the house is well insulated and centrally heated? Doing so, and using 1kW→4.4A for the hair driers would give me a socket total or around 65A and house total of 95A so OK against the 100A max for a single main switch/fuse.

Sorry for the basic nature of my question, but everyone has a different approach and this is my first Diversity calculation.

Parents
  • “This is with good reason, as fairly often a non standard layout is not in fact the result of some brilliant masterstroke  of design by a hitherto unrecognised genius,  but rather some hapless cock-up by an over-keen diy type, and in that case serves as an alarm bell that there may  be more horrors to be found.”

     

    Wise words and put in a very amusing way.

     

    Many times I see one ring final (or radial) feeding sockets and one or two lighting circuits on a cheap rewire and in practice they last for years with few problems. 

    Personally I like to see two socket circuits and two lighting circuits as an absolute minimum in any installation. That is just to reduce the chances of losing all sockets or all lights at any one instance.

    If you had two identical properties with identical use then the one with two of each circuit would not use any more than the one with one of each circuit. It is dependant upon likely use total. 

    Therefore applying diversity calculations often do not match.

    That is why the floorspace consideration (plus intended type of use) seems more appropriate.

    I recently did a rewire for a friend of mine with 5 rings and 5 lighting circuits but two of each would have been OK . It just added a bit more resilience in case of a fault (or powering a circuit down for additions and alterations).

    Yes it`s ok to have two rings (or radials) on one MCB it is still one circuit. Although it is sometimes an indication that someone has created a spare way to create a shower circuit or something and modified what was originally in place. It can be done, for example, to reduce ring end to end cable lengths of a massively drop fed circuit thereby having its merits if you do not have a spare way in the consumer unit and normally you`d be happy with one circuit feeding all of those sockets (or lights) . 

    Whilst having loads of different circuits can indeed make it possible for the total load drawn, the really big question is, what is the likely max current draw for anything over X time (X might be 5 mins, 10 mins etc etc etc) . How do you calculate diversity? that is the question.

Reply
  • “This is with good reason, as fairly often a non standard layout is not in fact the result of some brilliant masterstroke  of design by a hitherto unrecognised genius,  but rather some hapless cock-up by an over-keen diy type, and in that case serves as an alarm bell that there may  be more horrors to be found.”

     

    Wise words and put in a very amusing way.

     

    Many times I see one ring final (or radial) feeding sockets and one or two lighting circuits on a cheap rewire and in practice they last for years with few problems. 

    Personally I like to see two socket circuits and two lighting circuits as an absolute minimum in any installation. That is just to reduce the chances of losing all sockets or all lights at any one instance.

    If you had two identical properties with identical use then the one with two of each circuit would not use any more than the one with one of each circuit. It is dependant upon likely use total. 

    Therefore applying diversity calculations often do not match.

    That is why the floorspace consideration (plus intended type of use) seems more appropriate.

    I recently did a rewire for a friend of mine with 5 rings and 5 lighting circuits but two of each would have been OK . It just added a bit more resilience in case of a fault (or powering a circuit down for additions and alterations).

    Yes it`s ok to have two rings (or radials) on one MCB it is still one circuit. Although it is sometimes an indication that someone has created a spare way to create a shower circuit or something and modified what was originally in place. It can be done, for example, to reduce ring end to end cable lengths of a massively drop fed circuit thereby having its merits if you do not have a spare way in the consumer unit and normally you`d be happy with one circuit feeding all of those sockets (or lights) . 

    Whilst having loads of different circuits can indeed make it possible for the total load drawn, the really big question is, what is the likely max current draw for anything over X time (X might be 5 mins, 10 mins etc etc etc) . How do you calculate diversity? that is the question.

Children
No Data