This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Spot the Non-Compliances, Dangers and Failures here.

  • Hmm. I only got about 40% thru it. I would rather try to spot the compliances, a far easier task.  Start from scratch I think

  • ebee: 
     

    Hmm. I only got about 40% thru it. I would rather try to spot the compliances, a far easier task.  Start from scratch I think

    I think it's safer to stay at home rather than visit these exotic resorts.

    Z.

  • Mostly this stuff is just single fault to danger - exposed basic insulation, use of singles where we would want insulated and sheathed, and in other places cut-back earths. Not so dissimilar to the pre 13A plug days here.

    The 2 cases of bare copper where the core insulation of the 3 phase extension leads have been bitten by the cord grips of the connectors are probably the most dangerous thing.

    However even with that I bet there have been no actual fatalities reported since it was installed.

    We are very mollycoddled here in in the UK and we tend to forget that there are different risk balances in other places. Our own approach of insisting on double fault to danger, often plus additional measures as well, is a level of paranoia that would be seen as gross overkill in many other places. 

    There are parts of South America that would be worse in terms of exposed live wires, and India would have the tape and twist joins, but not have the choc blocs.

    I suggest we should try and travel actually, either in person or virtually, just  to occasionally re-calibrate our sense of what is a real risk, and what is imagined.

    Mike

  • I couldn't cope with the whole film, but wasn't the most dangerous thing handling live parts with unknown dangers lurking?