This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Very long run of LV Cabling

Hi all,

 

im looking at a project where the landlords LV cut out is approx 850 metres from the proposed tenants installation. The earthing arrangement is TT and protected by a time delayed 300ma RCD and a 63A MCCB.

 

The landlords sub main is going to be 2 x 4C 95mm2 in parallel buried in the ground to supply 20KVA worth of power. This achieved a volt drop of 1.6% which leaves 1.9% VD for lighting. From my Amtech calcs I also get about 1ka at the load Dis board (Phase fault)

 

im not worried about Earth Loop because of the RCD, but i am thinking about the adibatic of the phase conductors. If the tenant puts a long run of cabling in, this will comply from a Zs perspective, but could there be issues with the line under a phase to neutral /phase to phase fault as the cable could slowly cook under a lowish load without tripping the breaker. Is this a valid concern? Amtech isn’t throwing up any faults, but just wanted your thoughts.

 

thanks in advance

Parents
  • Why is it that the Government thinks that energy use can virtually stop? Typically a large festival needs 2 500 kVA generators per stage, one as running backup in case of problems. I, therefore, need 200 kVA X 18 hours of batteries per day that can manage a peak discharge of 500 kW. This is 9 MWhr / day and some festivals last 5 or more days. I would need 2 sets of inverters and some backup batteries. From Tesla, such a battery would cost at least 2 million pounds for each day, and a pile of lorries rather than one to move it. It is therefore fairly clear that this measure is simply to raise taxes from the entertainment industry (again), and not about anything else. BTW such large batteries would be very dangerous being transported, an accident could start a pretty big and dangerous fire, much worse than a diesel tanker accident which would probably not catch fire and contains more than 10 times as much energy. Imagine a feature film working for 2 months. Less power but much longer. Or a television show like Wimbledon. Mains power may be available in some places, but generators are the mainstay for all this work, partly because they cost less and partly because of the convenience of turning up and power is immediately available.

Reply
  • Why is it that the Government thinks that energy use can virtually stop? Typically a large festival needs 2 500 kVA generators per stage, one as running backup in case of problems. I, therefore, need 200 kVA X 18 hours of batteries per day that can manage a peak discharge of 500 kW. This is 9 MWhr / day and some festivals last 5 or more days. I would need 2 sets of inverters and some backup batteries. From Tesla, such a battery would cost at least 2 million pounds for each day, and a pile of lorries rather than one to move it. It is therefore fairly clear that this measure is simply to raise taxes from the entertainment industry (again), and not about anything else. BTW such large batteries would be very dangerous being transported, an accident could start a pretty big and dangerous fire, much worse than a diesel tanker accident which would probably not catch fire and contains more than 10 times as much energy. Imagine a feature film working for 2 months. Less power but much longer. Or a television show like Wimbledon. Mains power may be available in some places, but generators are the mainstay for all this work, partly because they cost less and partly because of the convenience of turning up and power is immediately available.

Children
No Data