With have heard reports of smart meters tripping RCDs, is there any more than anecdotal evidence?
The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
With have heard reports of smart meters tripping RCDs, is there any more than anecdotal evidence?
Is that referring to a Type G RCD or a Type G SPD, I am assuming it is a RCD but it seems it could be either or both.
I think a G-type RCD is one with a very small deliberate delay - around 10ms - so it still provides additional shock protection (overall it's still within the 300ms at 30mA and 40ms at 150mA limits) but is less sensitive to very short duration residual currents/surges.
If the (presumably non-delayed) 300mA device is tripping and but the downstream 30mA ones aren't then that to me points to a large magnitude (>>150mA) but short duration (<40ms) pulse of residual current, where both devices are in their 'may or may not trip' regions.
Modern boilers do normally ignore the gas by a generated spark - galvanically that should be all contained within the boiler but I suppose some strange fault might let the surge escape. If the boiler is close there might possibly be some radio interference (the original radio transmitters were a spark gap with an aerial/earth connection just to help the effect propagate longer distances) but again the original design should have prevented such a problem.
Other thought is the classic DP switch in front of a high resistance N-PE fault - with the switch fully open or fully closed there's little leakage, but if the N opens slightly before L or closed slightly later than L, then there can be a momentary surge of current to PE.
- Andy,
"Modern boilers do normally ignore the gas by a generated spark". I like that.
And in someone else's comment in another recent thread there's "hypnotic" instead of "hypothetical".
Does this new site have spelling "correction" that I haven't yet been victim of, or at least haven't noticed? These seem unlikely words to have come by accident, and I don't remember such gems from the earlier site. Or perhaps it's mobile devices doing clever AI-based inference of what's meant.
And now I remember also a "route 3" versus "root 3" that might have had the same reason.
Inside the modern boiler, as well as the spark ignition is also a micro-controller and a fair amount of delicate sensor electronics to keep the fan speed mass air flow and so forth all on the efficiency knife edge - designs where the ignition was bosky enough to fire an RCD at 40 paces by EMP would almost certainly at the least re-set its own processor if not put itself unequivocally beyond use. I think we can rule that out.
Something like a shared neutral that only comes into circuit when the pump is on and the 3 way valve is in the hot water position might just about sneak in under the net as it were, but I think even that would have already been found during other tests.
Beware of the autoKrikketer and double check your spellings before committing to witchcraft as a career.
Some errors phrase are funnier then others
M.
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement