This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

What do you consider a sample to mean during an EICR

I’m interested to hear peoples opinions on how they approach an EICR with regards to a sample? I’m asking because I was recently reviewing a couple of domestic EICRs for a client and raised a couple of questions one being that test results were only recorded for two of the six circuits. The response was that they were employed only to carry out a 20% sample. Personally I’ve always considered a 20% sample to mean that all circuits should be tested but only at 20% of the accessories connected to them will be fully tested and inspected. I’ve also always thought when carrying out an EICR for the purposes of private lettings that this practice is only an option when the previous records are available, and if you do choose to carry out a small sample you’d be likely to widen the search if you found any C2’s or C1s. What is everyone’s thoughts here, how does the community approach EICRs?

I was just surprised to see an unsatisfactory report where the sample hadn’t been widened and where four circuits had no test results recorded, not even Insulation resistance, it’s so quick getting IR results on a single phase board.

Parents
  • We already know that the drive bye EICR is common every day practice for a significant number of contractors and a substantial number of people going to site are not qualified or competent to carry out inspecting at testing. 

    I have written a standard specification that sets out a MINIMUM level of inspection and testing to verify the objective of Regulation 651.1. It also sets out the competency requirement for the inspector and the report format together with an insurance requirement.

    It is useful for clients to specify what they want done and more useful for the decent honest contractor to specify what they are going to do rather than the cowboy who will have no interest in reforming their way.

    It is free issue to anyone who wants it by emailing me on info(the symbol for at)astutetechnicalservices.co.uk. And no I am not looking for work or any financial gain out of supplying this document.

Reply
  • We already know that the drive bye EICR is common every day practice for a significant number of contractors and a substantial number of people going to site are not qualified or competent to carry out inspecting at testing. 

    I have written a standard specification that sets out a MINIMUM level of inspection and testing to verify the objective of Regulation 651.1. It also sets out the competency requirement for the inspector and the report format together with an insurance requirement.

    It is useful for clients to specify what they want done and more useful for the decent honest contractor to specify what they are going to do rather than the cowboy who will have no interest in reforming their way.

    It is free issue to anyone who wants it by emailing me on info(the symbol for at)astutetechnicalservices.co.uk. And no I am not looking for work or any financial gain out of supplying this document.

Children
No Data