This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Scope of Part P (extra-low voltage)

I'm trying to understand the scope of Part P as at the extra low voltage end of things it seems a bit contentious. Below is an extract from Approved Part P and it includes extra-low voltage. That raises some questions:

  1. Would 48V DC be in the scope of Part P as extra-low voltage appears to have no bottom end, just a top end at 50V AC and 120V DC? As an example, installing house wide lighting 'through the fabric of the building' run with a plug in 48V supply (plugged into a socket outlet).
  2. Lots of people are retrofitting under unit lights into their kitchens which are 12V. They have a plug in transformer, but in many cases the wires are then routed 'through the fabric of the building'. Why isn't this in the scope of Part P if a house wide extra-low voltage lighting system would be?

The second case could arguably be an 'electrical installation' too as although it is plugged in to an outlet, the wires and lights are fixed.

Is it that both of these would be in the scope of Part P, but if both plugged in to existing outlets, they wouldn't be notifiable? If that's the case, in theory they could also both have wired in transformers spurred off an existing circuit as that would only be notifiable if it's an 'addition or alteration to existing circuits in a special location' which if it didn't include a bathroom it wouldn't be. Am I understanding that right?

There's a bit of a can of worms here, but LEDs are becoming so efficient that house wide extra-low voltage systems may start to become more of a thing.

Parents
  • That was the original version of Part P, the powers that be did at least have the decency to get rid of those appendixes in the revised version, but mentioning it sets the background for the current discussion.

    The notification requirements are not based on sound engineering principles, but on decisions by Civil Servants and politicians who did not actually fully understand the issues, then they had another go at it and we have ended up with different versions of the same legislation and different notification requirements in England and Wales.

    So geography and politics rather than voltage.

    The current version of Part P www.niceic.com/.../Part-P-Approved-Document-2013-England.pdf

Reply
  • That was the original version of Part P, the powers that be did at least have the decency to get rid of those appendixes in the revised version, but mentioning it sets the background for the current discussion.

    The notification requirements are not based on sound engineering principles, but on decisions by Civil Servants and politicians who did not actually fully understand the issues, then they had another go at it and we have ended up with different versions of the same legislation and different notification requirements in England and Wales.

    So geography and politics rather than voltage.

    The current version of Part P www.niceic.com/.../Part-P-Approved-Document-2013-England.pdf

Children
No Data