The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Cooker and shower on the same circuit

Hello everyone,

A few months back, a qualified electrician told me that a cooker and a shower can both be put on the same circuit; that doesn't sound right, surely loads using such a large amount of power must be on their own individual circuits?

I haven't been able to ask a question about this until now because I had difficulty logging into my IET account and had to get a new username and password for it.

Thank you,

Dasa

Parents
  • I cannot believe that this thread is still going.

    The argument seems to be that the worst case scenario is that the protective device trips occasionally - assuming of course that the cable and OCPD are properly coordinated.

    This then gets called "nuisance tripping", but IMHO there is no such thing. Either a device trips because an appliance is faulty, in which case it is doing the job for which it is intended; or due to bad design.

    I also think that diversity is being mis-used here. 311.1 "... diversity may be taken into account." (my emphasis) So there is every possibility that the householder will take a shower whilst the oven is warming up, in which case the maximum demand is the sum of the two appliances. By contrast, if a house has a dozen sockets on a ring, it is most unlikely that large loads will be plugged into more than a couple outlets, let alone the whole lot.

    If I were doing an EICR on this hypothetically over-loaded circuit, I would pay close attention to the terminals in the CU and junction boxes. Any sign of significant distress would be a C2, otherwise C3.

Reply
  • I cannot believe that this thread is still going.

    The argument seems to be that the worst case scenario is that the protective device trips occasionally - assuming of course that the cable and OCPD are properly coordinated.

    This then gets called "nuisance tripping", but IMHO there is no such thing. Either a device trips because an appliance is faulty, in which case it is doing the job for which it is intended; or due to bad design.

    I also think that diversity is being mis-used here. 311.1 "... diversity may be taken into account." (my emphasis) So there is every possibility that the householder will take a shower whilst the oven is warming up, in which case the maximum demand is the sum of the two appliances. By contrast, if a house has a dozen sockets on a ring, it is most unlikely that large loads will be plugged into more than a couple outlets, let alone the whole lot.

    If I were doing an EICR on this hypothetically over-loaded circuit, I would pay close attention to the terminals in the CU and junction boxes. Any sign of significant distress would be a C2, otherwise C3.

Children
No Data