This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

AMD2 - Clause 422.2 - Cables in protected escape routes.

Evening all,

So, this is causing me some head scratching. Why oh why did this make it through the DPC?

As soon as an escape route is required to be of fire rated construction, we can't use it for main containment routes. Or am I missing something?

Parents
  • Note sure. The IET presentation on youtube seemed to indicate that it was beyond the scope of BS7671 to comment or regulate on fire safety regulations, thus rendering the responsibility beyond the electrical aspects of a project. At least that is how it came across to me.

    Why did it make it through the dpc? Never underestimate the ability of logic to quickly depart from the process of creating regulations of any kind.

    www.youtube.com/watch

Reply
  • Note sure. The IET presentation on youtube seemed to indicate that it was beyond the scope of BS7671 to comment or regulate on fire safety regulations, thus rendering the responsibility beyond the electrical aspects of a project. At least that is how it came across to me.

    Why did it make it through the dpc? Never underestimate the ability of logic to quickly depart from the process of creating regulations of any kind.

    www.youtube.com/watch

Children
  • I started to view the video clip. I will watch it in its entirety when I have time, BUT why is the quality so bad? For an organisation called the Institution of Engineering and Technology why can't it get the poor sound quality sorted our. There is bad reverb in an early presentation. AND why can't the speakers enunciate clearly, speak slowly  instead of gabbling and mumbling?

    3/10.

    Z.