Evening all,
So, this is causing me some head scratching. Why oh why did this make it through the DPC?
As soon as an escape route is required to be of fire rated construction, we can't use it for main containment routes. Or am I missing something?
Evening all,
So, this is causing me some head scratching. Why oh why did this make it through the DPC?
As soon as an escape route is required to be of fire rated construction, we can't use it for main containment routes. Or am I missing something?
I think this is one of the biggest changes that has far reaching consequences. In my field - railways, this is a huge change.
Protected escape routes can only be defined by the Responsible Person (RP) for the fire safety of the building, not the electrician or designer. So the RP will need to be consulted so as to ascertain where the protected escape routes are. Without that information, the designer will have to detail the lack of this information in their designers risk assessment and move on.
I think this is one of the biggest changes that has far reaching consequences. In my field - railways, this is a huge change.
Protected escape routes can only be defined by the Responsible Person (RP) for the fire safety of the building, not the electrician or designer. So the RP will need to be consulted so as to ascertain where the protected escape routes are. Without that information, the designer will have to detail the lack of this information in their designers risk assessment and move on.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site