Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 45 replies
  • Subscribers 43 subscribers
  • Views 7924 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

RCD TESTING BS7671:2018+A2:2022

sparkiemike

Anybody notice the changes to 643.7.1 and 643.8 when it comes to RCD testing. In the note it says that "Regardless of the RCD type, effectiveness is deemed to have been verified where an RCD disconnects with in the time stated below with an alternating current test rated at residual operating current I△n"

So the minimum requirement is to set your instrument to RCD type AC and carry out the test even if you have a Type A or Type B RCD.

Parents

  • The 9th Ed of GN3 (2020), Section 2.6.18, says:

    Before using a test instrument, the RCD test button should be pressed. This provides basic information that the RCD is functioning, and will help avoid danger that may occur during test if the RCD did not respond.

    That is a shame. Most meters handle a non-tripping RCD quite gracefully and just time out after a second or so and issue a warning. The internal test resistors inside the RCD do not generally have any protection however, preferring if the contacts are stuck to burn out violently and startle the button pressor with a crack like a small banger of the kind kids used to bring back on the ferry from day trips to France..

    I presume the authors of the GN have not actually done enough testing to encounter that failure mode.. It can be quite unnerving. I'd strongly recommend reversing that in the next edition, and saying why.

    Mike.

  • in reply to mapj1

    Agree Mike, can't see a real world problem here, only lots of theoreticals, a bit like my useless Consultant.

    So, does dropping the previous multitest requirement mean that we should see much cheaper testers enter the market? Every cloud and all that jazz.

Reply
  • in reply to mapj1

    Agree Mike, can't see a real world problem here, only lots of theoreticals, a bit like my useless Consultant.

    So, does dropping the previous multitest requirement mean that we should see much cheaper testers enter the market? Every cloud and all that jazz.

Children
  • in reply to whjohnson
    whjohnson said:
    Agree Mike, can't see a real world problem here, only lots of theoreticals,

    A bit like the need to test RCDs in the first place? And in saying that, I'm not saying that RCDs don't fail (some mcb's do, and I've seen that also) ... but we're cherry-picking risks I think?

Community Rules & Guidelines