Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 37 subscribers
  • Views 1155 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Requirement or recommendation

lyledunn

“One key point to be aware of is that a recommendation in BS7671 is not a “soft requirement”. That means that not following a recommendation within the standard is neither a non-compliance, nor does it need to be cited as a departure in certification. However, whatever action is taken should result in an installation which is no less safe as a result of the action taken”. 
Quote from NICEIC Connections magazine.

So, the implication is that leaving out AFDDs in standard domestic installations, their provision is only a recommendation in BS761, should leave the installation no less safe than if the AFDDs had been installed. One would then either need to determine that AFDDs would not provide any additional safety or one would have to introduce additional control measures to address any quantified shortfall in safety that their omission would cause.

Parents
  • 0

    Amongst the various requirements for negligence to have been made out is a breach of the standard of care which the client is entitled to expect.

    I would think that failing to meet a statutory requirement (e.g. ESQCR) would be a difficult bullet to dodge. Then we have things like HSE ACOPs and Advice (the latter carries less weight than the former) as well as standards such as BS 7671. It seems fairly obvious that a recommendation carries less weight than a requirement.

    Given the fairly widespread scepticism over AFDDs (here and elsewhere), I doubt that their omission from a standard domestic installation would be a problem, but it does seem wise to ensure that the client is aware of the recommendation, and perhaps to quote with and without.

Reply
  • 0

    Amongst the various requirements for negligence to have been made out is a breach of the standard of care which the client is entitled to expect.

    I would think that failing to meet a statutory requirement (e.g. ESQCR) would be a difficult bullet to dodge. Then we have things like HSE ACOPs and Advice (the latter carries less weight than the former) as well as standards such as BS 7671. It seems fairly obvious that a recommendation carries less weight than a requirement.

    Given the fairly widespread scepticism over AFDDs (here and elsewhere), I doubt that their omission from a standard domestic installation would be a problem, but it does seem wise to ensure that the client is aware of the recommendation, and perhaps to quote with and without.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines