This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Micrologic or TM-D

Hi all,

Currently speccing an LV system for a school and cannot justify the extra cost of using a Micrologic system (included in a previous design specification) rather than regular Thermal-Magnetic breaking.

Would anybody be able to shine a light on the main operational differences and how I could justify the extra cost to a client? If not I will de-spec to TM-D

Thanks!

Tom

Parents
  • The TM-D breaker is only adjustable for overload currents, whereas the Micrologic breaker has time/current adjustment for short circuit protection. It is often only possible to achieve selectivity by using the short time adjustments available on the Micrologic device. Only a calculation of your system will prove this of course, and if you are not in a position to calculate it and prove compliance with a TM-D at present, then I'd specify Micrologic. 

    regards, burn

  • Micrologic is designed to overcome a particular selectivity problem in large installations, where MCCBs or MCBs are specified throughout. They are comparatively expensive and need a good reason to choose. Using BS88s on submains etc, is generally cheaper, but you will still need a selectivity study on your design if selectivity is required to be perfect. All this is part of the design process, you should not try to control the designer too much!

Reply
  • Micrologic is designed to overcome a particular selectivity problem in large installations, where MCCBs or MCBs are specified throughout. They are comparatively expensive and need a good reason to choose. Using BS88s on submains etc, is generally cheaper, but you will still need a selectivity study on your design if selectivity is required to be perfect. All this is part of the design process, you should not try to control the designer too much!

Children
No Data