This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

PROTECTIVE EQUIPOTENTIAL BONDING. 411.3.1.2

"Dad?"

"Yes son"

"Have you noticed the extra words added to the bonding regulation, 411.3.1.2?"

"No, what are they?"

"The regulation now says with regard to extraneous-conductive-parts, they need bonding if they are LIABLE TO INTRODUCE A DANGEROUS POTENTIAL DIFFERENCE"

"Why have those words been added Dad?"

Z.

Parents
  • To my mind the extra words are strictly speaking unnecessary - as the concept creating a hazardous potential difference by introducing a another potential into the installation is already covered in the definition of an extraneous-conductive-part. I guess they've just put them in there to reinforce the "change" (i.e. a change of attitude, not of underlying principles) that internal metal pipework only connected to the outside by plastic pipework, need not be bonded.

      - Andy.

Reply
  • To my mind the extra words are strictly speaking unnecessary - as the concept creating a hazardous potential difference by introducing a another potential into the installation is already covered in the definition of an extraneous-conductive-part. I guess they've just put them in there to reinforce the "change" (i.e. a change of attitude, not of underlying principles) that internal metal pipework only connected to the outside by plastic pipework, need not be bonded.

      - Andy.

Children
No Data