Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 24 replies
  • Subscribers 45 subscribers
  • Views 4320 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

CHANGES IN AMD 2 RELUCTANCE TO COMPLY

John Peckham

I heard before AMD 2 that compliance with the requirement to install AFDDs where required would stop clients having consumer units upgraded due to the additional cost. 

The requirement to fit as a "shall" is limited to 4 types of installation has anyone experienced a refusal to upgrade the installation with AFDDs when replacing a consumer unit?

Also has anyone experienced any reluctance when upgrading an installation where SPDs are required under the new provisions of AMD 2?

The same question as above, any reluctance to install smoke detectors in domestic premises where an SPD needs to be fitted to the circuit supply the smoke detectors?

Thanks

JP

 

Parents
  • 0

    I know someone who is scheduled to have an old consumer unit replaced (14 circuits in use, domestic) as it has no RCD protection and exposed bus bars. Replacement will be all RCBO. AFDDs were not even offered...

Reply
  • 0

    I know someone who is scheduled to have an old consumer unit replaced (14 circuits in use, domestic) as it has no RCD protection and exposed bus bars. Replacement will be all RCBO. AFDDs were not even offered...

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines