This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

AFDDs - when do they work?

I'm struggling to see the benefots of fitting AFDD's.

I've searched the web, but cannot find any compelling evidence that they actually help in safety.

 The Proffesional Journals all say they are a good thing, but with little content to show the data used to show they make a difference.

As we know, many fires are not caused by arcs, the build up of fluff in a tumble dryer is a typical example.

When I did my Social Housing work, I found many burnt out shower switches, along with washing machine sockets and occasional cooker switches that were totally burnt around the terminals, yet, in many cases would still work until the switch finally fell apart. Clearly some of these switches had been arcing, then had fused the cable to the terminal, others showed black terminals with only a small contact area, thus heating the terminals and causing the 'fishy' smell, which was quite typical.

Is there any evidence that AFDD's would stop these failures?

What about internal appliance faults?

Wasnt Grenfell started in a fridge? If so, would AFDD detect that fault?

And, what are appliance manufacturers doing to make their goods safer? From what I see, there are still thin tin plate terminals on cookers,and poor, loose spade terminals inside firdges and other appliances.They are made to be as cheap as possible, and it shows when you tighten up a terminal, and it bends the back plate as it is so thin.   

Parents
  • It is a bit of a technical aside, but if it is really needed you can test fuses non destructively (and we do for things very similar to fuses that are rather more safety critical).

    The resistance rise = element temperature rise for a step change in load is verified.  The change in temp tells you the fusible link cross section is within spec, and the time constant tells you the filling material, like sand in an HRC fuse, is in good contact with the element. If it heats up too  fast it tells you the filling is missing or  there is an air void.

    mike.

Reply
  • It is a bit of a technical aside, but if it is really needed you can test fuses non destructively (and we do for things very similar to fuses that are rather more safety critical).

    The resistance rise = element temperature rise for a step change in load is verified.  The change in temp tells you the fusible link cross section is within spec, and the time constant tells you the filling material, like sand in an HRC fuse, is in good contact with the element. If it heats up too  fast it tells you the filling is missing or  there is an air void.

    mike.

Children
  • The resistance rise = element temperature rise for a step change in load is verified.  The change in temp tells you the fusible link cross section is within spec, and the time constant tells you the filling material, like sand in an HRC fuse, is in good contact with the element. If it heats up too  fast it tells you the filling is missing or  there is an air void.

    Agreed ... but we never do that ourselves, we trust the manufacturer already did it in the factory (or decided it's not necessary because we trust other things that were done.

    Equally, we could use various kinds of scans etc. to verify, like with complex PCB or semiconductor assemblies. These would be more accurate in terms of checking for uniformity of diameter of a fuse wire (or thickness/shape of a more complex fashioned fuse link) etc.