This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

In what stage should you design the distribution circuits containing third harmonic current?

In design stage of the larger installation, I think, it is quite difficult to decide which (three-phase) distribution circuit has third harmonic current.

 

But BS7671 523.6.3 says that if the total harmonic distortion due to third harmonic current or multiple of third harmonic is greater than 15% of the fundamental line current, the neutral conductor shall not be smaller than the line conductor.

 

I imagine that the sub-main to a distribution board which supply many articles of elecronic equipment has the third harmonic current.

But how do you estimate that the circuit has third harmonic being greater than, for example, 15% of the line conductor.

 

I think there must be an established method or a traditonal practice or a rule of thumb that a few like me don’t know.

 

I am very grateful if someone tell me what phase is appropriate to design the distribution circuits containing 3rd harmononic current and how to estimate 3rd harmonic content of line current in a design stage, if any.

Parents
  • A large fraction of 3 phase distributions suppliers single phase loads spread over the 3 phases. In such a case you need to allow for the unbalanced cases, when perhaps all the loads on one phase are switched off but the others are not - buildings with one  phase per floor or something can be like that.

    In such a case again the full size neutral is needed.

    Actually it is better to assume the regulation is written backwards, and the neutral is always full sized, except in the rare event when the load is fixed and its power factor/ waveform quality is well known.
    Basically fully balanced loads of  good power factor are the only ones that you can be sure will not stress the neutral conductor.

    A poor power factor can be a measure of both harmonic content (non-sinusoidal wave-forms) or phase shift,. (good waveform but current and voltage not in phase) so a poor power factor does not mean there will always be a lot of harmonics, it could just be a lot of inductance, but the reverse is always true, a good power factor means there cannot be harmonics.

    You may find the more detailed explanation here is more help.

    Mike

Reply
  • A large fraction of 3 phase distributions suppliers single phase loads spread over the 3 phases. In such a case you need to allow for the unbalanced cases, when perhaps all the loads on one phase are switched off but the others are not - buildings with one  phase per floor or something can be like that.

    In such a case again the full size neutral is needed.

    Actually it is better to assume the regulation is written backwards, and the neutral is always full sized, except in the rare event when the load is fixed and its power factor/ waveform quality is well known.
    Basically fully balanced loads of  good power factor are the only ones that you can be sure will not stress the neutral conductor.

    A poor power factor can be a measure of both harmonic content (non-sinusoidal wave-forms) or phase shift,. (good waveform but current and voltage not in phase) so a poor power factor does not mean there will always be a lot of harmonics, it could just be a lot of inductance, but the reverse is always true, a good power factor means there cannot be harmonics.

    You may find the more detailed explanation here is more help.

    Mike

Children
  • To Mike

    Your words ‘A poor power factor can be a measure of both harmonic content (non-sinusoidal wave-forms) or phase shift’ open my eyas.

    Thank you.

  • I might be wrong here, but I don't think you can get TPN cable with a reduced neutral any more. I haven't seen any for years.