This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Earth Sleeving ... what's it for?

Prompted by a comment in this thread:  Have you ever done it like this?

I thought it would be worth airing some opinions on the purpose of 'earth sleeving':

(a) According to BS 7671 (what Regulations require it, and for what purpose?)

(b) According to other risk reduction measures

  • for identification...reg 514?

  • To stop the bare earth wire touching live parts in an enclosure, such as terminal screws.

  •  Ages ago when ring final 13 Amp sockets were protected by 30 Amp. fuse wire, and R.C.D.s were not used, I came upon a socket where the unsleeved and uninsulated three strand tinned copper earth wire had come into contact with the live conductor/terminal of the socket. Yes it was called live back then. Live was red and neutral was black. I seem to remember that at least one if not two of the earth wire strands had completely burned through and were broken. Such was the power of a live to earth fault. P.V.C. earth sleeving would have prevented that incident.

    The type of cable is shown above.

    Z.

  • 514.1.2

    514.3.2

    514.4.6 Bare conductors to be identified by various methods including sleeving.

    Z.

  • To stop the bare earth wire touching live parts in an enclosure, such as terminal screws.

      ... good point, what Regulation, or hazard/risk, is that intended to address (that's not already covered by other requirements such as protection against overcurrent, or ADS)?

  • If we always add sleeving, and I think we pretty much always do, it rather begs the question why we do not do as other countries and allow cables with insulation in the earth core already - as made for ~Ireland for example

    Or TPS for Australia

    If it existed, I for one would be inclined to specify it.

    Mike

  • I don't think that we forbid it, but presumably insulating only the live conductors is cheaper.

  • An uninsulated earth conductor in twin and earth is probably more effective than an insulated one, if someone puts a nail through a T&E and it clips a live conductor it’s more likely to short out onto a bare CPC than an insulated one.

    It is amazing how on a wall several metres wide someone can manage to hit a 2.5 mm conductor in a twin and earth cable with a nail putting a picture up.

  • 514.3.2 Every core of a cable shall be identifiable at its terminations and preferably throughout its length.

  • Graham,

    132.1(2) Proper functioning. A tripped R.C.D. or tripped M.C.B due to a C.P.C. to L short just will not do!

    Z.