Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 3617 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Single pole breakers 3 phase trunking and shared neutral

vantech

Hi, 

I have a question regarding the use of single pole MCBs on lighting trunking systems.

The idea is that the trunking system contains 8 conductors, used as follows:

L1, L2, L3, N, E (supply one - grid) 

L1, N, E (supply two - central battery for emergency lighting)

The central battery supplies lighting during an outage (AC during normal operation, DC during grid failure). This aspect is fine. 

What the customer wants is to avoid a single point of failure. Preciously, on the maintained or grid supply, L1, L2 and L3 were connected to and protected by a 3 pole MCB (across 3 phases) with a shared neutral. Moving forward, the customer has queried using single pole MCBs to protect each of the phases (split across 3 phases) and a shared neutral, thus meaning if a single MCB trips, the other 2 circuits will remain live. 

I don’t see anything wrong with this, in fact, the same result would be apparent if fuses were used. The reason I raise the question is for the purposes of isolation; when using a 3 pole MCB, a single switch can isolate an entire track however when using single pole MCBs, there are then in essence multiple points of isolation. 

Am I right in thinking that single pole MCBs can be used with a single/shared neutral, as long as the line conductors are split between 3 phases and there is appropriate labelling at all connection points for “isolation at multiple locations”? 

Thanks. 

Parents
  • 0

    Depending on how the lights are wired there could be a definite advantage to having SP protection on each phase. If the lights to each work area are supplied by a mixture of each phase then the tripping of one MCB would reduce the lighting level by one third, possibly allowing work in that area to carry on. A 3P MCB tripping would trigger the EM which might not allow this.

  • 0 in reply to OlympusMons

    This is exactly it, emergency lighting isn’t suitable for continuous works, it’s for evacuation purposes. The client wants a reduced lighting level, rather than a total outage of main lighting. 

Reply
  • 0 in reply to OlympusMons

    This is exactly it, emergency lighting isn’t suitable for continuous works, it’s for evacuation purposes. The client wants a reduced lighting level, rather than a total outage of main lighting. 

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines