Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 39 subscribers
  • Views 2806 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

The ability to self-declare “competence” should not be possible.

Sparkingchip

Having looked for the Electrical Safety Round Table website this morning, I left the page open and went back to it again; and have been looking at the campaigns.

Anomaly-with-Approved-Document-P-discussion-paper.pdf (electricalsafetyroundtable.co.uk)

Any thoughts?

Parents

  • Whilst that is true, the underlying legislation has not changed (yet). LA building control is NOT competent to be involved because it is very unlikely any of their staff is qualified in Electrics. If this scheme (part P) continues they should have a statutory duty to have several qualified Inspectors of their own, asking another vested interest is clearly ridiculous.

Reply

  • Whilst that is true, the underlying legislation has not changed (yet). LA building control is NOT competent to be involved because it is very unlikely any of their staff is qualified in Electrics. If this scheme (part P) continues they should have a statutory duty to have several qualified Inspectors of their own, asking another vested interest is clearly ridiculous.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines