Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 6 replies
  • Subscribers 38 subscribers
  • Views 1790 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

EICR Observations and Recommendations webinar - Free to attend!

Lisa Miles

Electrical Installation Condition Report (EICR) Observations and Recommendations


DATE: Tuesday, 18 October 2022
TIME: 3 - 4:30pm (BST)

An EICR reports on the condition of the electrical installation of the integral wiring to highlight any safety shortcomings, defects or deviations from the current revision of the electrical regulations BS 7671.

During this webinar, speakers will discuss observations and recommendations when carrying out an electrical installation condition report (EICR) and ask the question: How can we ensure that our recommendations are as clear as possible, so that the recommendations are acted on and not overlooked. They will also discuss changes to the model forms in Amendment 2 of BS 7671:2018+A2.

Find out more and register to attend

Parents

  • Thanks Lisa - it was interesting.

    I was a little disappointed by the 'it depends which versions of the regs were in force when it was done' comments though - I thought the official position had been the reverse of that for a while now.

    The idea that two identical installations should be coded differently, even to the point of one being satisfactory and the other unsatisfactory, just because the presumed installation dates fell into different versions of the regs (one 31-Dec the other 1-Jan for example) doesn't seem at all logical to me.

       - Andy.

Reply

  • Thanks Lisa - it was interesting.

    I was a little disappointed by the 'it depends which versions of the regs were in force when it was done' comments though - I thought the official position had been the reverse of that for a while now.

    The idea that two identical installations should be coded differently, even to the point of one being satisfactory and the other unsatisfactory, just because the presumed installation dates fell into different versions of the regs (one 31-Dec the other 1-Jan for example) doesn't seem at all logical to me.

       - Andy.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines