This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

When is a PEI not a PEI?

"Prosumer" Electrical Installation that is - i.e. an installation that can both produce and consume electricity.

I've been looking over the new Part 8.

It seems to describe quite a sophisticated setup - a "smart" system if you like - dynamically changing things according to some pre-programmed algorithms - maybe to minimise imports, perhaps to export 'when the price is right', deciding whether storage (if present) should accumulate or release, or something else. There even seems to be a specific requirement that a PEI incorporate an 'Electrical Energy Management System' (EEMS) (822.4).

Which got me thinking - how does a conventional ("dumb") grid-tied PV system fit into this? - where the amount of power generated locally is uncontrolled (i.e. just depends on external variables such as sunlight) and the only "management" is what can be achieved using a length of copper and Ohm's Law (i.e. any surplus just gets exported).

Is the idea that such installations should be smarter in future, or is it just that the non-existent management system of a typical PV system can just scrape through as a 'minimal' EEMS?

    - Andy.

Parents
  • Do we not think it is just a typo and missing the word 'enough' ?,

    As in "a low enough impedance to ..."

    Or in other words a decent earth is needed as ADS must work promptly with all possible combinations of internal and external supply and all the possible variations in Zs and pssc that implies.

    It could have been clearer, and certainly if that is not what was meant then it really does need to be clarified.

    M

Reply
  • Do we not think it is just a typo and missing the word 'enough' ?,

    As in "a low enough impedance to ..."

    Or in other words a decent earth is needed as ADS must work promptly with all possible combinations of internal and external supply and all the possible variations in Zs and pssc that implies.

    It could have been clearer, and certainly if that is not what was meant then it really does need to be clarified.

    M

Children
No Data