The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

11kV/400V TX with no LV protection

I am working on a project where we have been asked to install a new LV cable from the outgoing side of a transformer to a new Panel board however the outgoing side of the transformer does not have any protection. We have raised this with the client however they have advised this is not an issue. I am looking for some guidance to back up our argument that the LV cable does not have any protection.

Parents
  • It is not relevant because this protection is not covered. BS7671 basically covers the LV side of installations, generally supplied by a DNO. Your private transformer puts you in the position of a DNO, and therefore you should at least examine their practice. A transformer is simply a device to change voltage, and the power on each side is directly related. As I have pointed out secondary currents are completely reflected in the primary, and this is the best and easiest place to provide protection against both overload and short circuits. The whole supply chain is yours, up until the HV metering. The BS7671 definitions of protection are therefore simply reflected to the HV supply, and there is no reason at all to not use this feature. The huge fault power available direct from the Grid is your main consideration, not the secondary cables, which you will find are very difficult to design with any normal protection anyway. Assuming the whole TX supplies one DB, the connecting cables are the least of your problems, the PSCC probably being the biggest. You will find it is probably 150-300 kA, and the weakest link is those connecting cables. HV fusing or CBs provides much the cheapest protection and anyway is required for your Grid connection.

Reply
  • It is not relevant because this protection is not covered. BS7671 basically covers the LV side of installations, generally supplied by a DNO. Your private transformer puts you in the position of a DNO, and therefore you should at least examine their practice. A transformer is simply a device to change voltage, and the power on each side is directly related. As I have pointed out secondary currents are completely reflected in the primary, and this is the best and easiest place to provide protection against both overload and short circuits. The whole supply chain is yours, up until the HV metering. The BS7671 definitions of protection are therefore simply reflected to the HV supply, and there is no reason at all to not use this feature. The huge fault power available direct from the Grid is your main consideration, not the secondary cables, which you will find are very difficult to design with any normal protection anyway. Assuming the whole TX supplies one DB, the connecting cables are the least of your problems, the PSCC probably being the biggest. You will find it is probably 150-300 kA, and the weakest link is those connecting cables. HV fusing or CBs provides much the cheapest protection and anyway is required for your Grid connection.

Children
No Data