Say, if the rating of a light fixture is 36W, what does it refer to? Is it the output watts equivalent of lumens? or the input power required by the fixture?
I ask this to calculate the input current to the fixture.
Input current = Watts / (Voltage x PF x Efficiency)
or
Input current = Watts / (Voltage x PF)
Normal convention is the input power, or sometimes the nominal input power rating of the replaceable lamp it's intended to contain. In neither case did it directly relate to the light output. There can nevertheless be an efficiency consideration - e.g. with traditional fluorescent fittings an amount of power would be lost in the control gear - e.g. a 38W fitting might draw maybe 42W from the circuit - 38W going to the tube and 4W being lost as heat from the ballast etc. Later, high frequency ballasts could get the same amount of light out of a tube with less power, so despite still having some control gear losses, so the power drawn from the circuit might actually be lower than than lamp's nominal rating.
Sometimes on consumer packaging for 'low energy' replacement lamps you'll see an "watts equivalent" - e.g. this 7W LED produces an equivalent amount of light as a 100W traditional GLS lamp - but that 100W is purely for ease of comparison and doesn't relate to actual power consumption in any way.
Efficiency (or efficacy) in terms of input Watts to light output is still pretty terrible - not as truly awful as old incandescents which might be well below 5% but still most of the power ends up as something else rather than visible light (usually heat).
- Andy.
Normal convention is the input power, or sometimes the nominal input power rating of the replaceable lamp it's intended to contain. In neither case did it directly relate to the light output. There can nevertheless be an efficiency consideration - e.g. with traditional fluorescent fittings an amount of power would be lost in the control gear - e.g. a 38W fitting might draw maybe 42W from the circuit - 38W going to the tube and 4W being lost as heat from the ballast etc. Later, high frequency ballasts could get the same amount of light out of a tube with less power, so despite still having some control gear losses, so the power drawn from the circuit might actually be lower than than lamp's nominal rating.
Sometimes on consumer packaging for 'low energy' replacement lamps you'll see an "watts equivalent" - e.g. this 7W LED produces an equivalent amount of light as a 100W traditional GLS lamp - but that 100W is purely for ease of comparison and doesn't relate to actual power consumption in any way.
Efficiency (or efficacy) in terms of input Watts to light output is still pretty terrible - not as truly awful as old incandescents which might be well below 5% but still most of the power ends up as something else rather than visible light (usually heat).
- Andy.
or sometimes the nominal input power rating of the replaceable lamp it's intended to contain
When CFLs came out, it seemed sensible to describe them in terms of the filament lamps they were replacing, but there must be plenty of younger people around now who wouldn't have a clue about a 100 W bulb, so perhaps there is no longer any need to talk about equivalent power.
Even talking about the wattage of an LED lamp can be misleading because they have been slowly getting more efficient.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site
