This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Best solution for primary distribution in residential property

I am looking at a project in a fairly large residential property and trying to avoid a collection of small consumer units near the supply head.

Supply is TNCS, no measurements at this stage

The supply head is in an external meter box, I will be putting an additional box of some sort next to it.

Based on a rough initial plan, from the meter head there will be the following connections

60A sub main on 16mm SWA to main house DB

60A sub main on 16mm SWA to garage, feeding two EV chargers with load management on main feed and garage submain.

Assuming 16A connection on 10mm cable to solar panels in field 30 to 50m away

Assuming 16A connection to battery inverter 5m away

House is on fused connection taken from henley blocks in main meter box, plan to leave this as it is and then run tails from henley blocks to second meter box.

Question is what do I do there to support the 3 connections

Initial thought has been an IP65 enclosure with 3 MCB's, but then I have some concerns

  • I don't think I can get an IP65 enclosure with a busbar capable of supporting 16mm cable for the load and MCB's for each of the circuits, with spare slots for future expansion
  • Cables will be armoured clipped direct or underground in ducting
  • Beginning to think a fused switch  might be better for the garage to provide better selectivity, downside is that I will end up with an enclosure for each submain?

VD on garage submain 1.36% and for a 63A fuse with 5 second disconnect time max earth fault loop impedance is achievable at 1.07 ohms. DB in garage will be all RCBO. Garage will be a TT island

Solar and battery system not my responsibility but trying to take a holistic view on design of distribution at the supply head

Are there better ways to do this, enclosures that support cartridge fuses and circuit breakers, just go with metal CU in IP65 enclosure.

Given that the meter head is actually in an open log store next to the house I am swaying towards everything going inside a metal IP65 enclosure

Welcome your thoughts

Parents
  • Initial thought has been an IP65 enclosure with 3 MCB's, but then I have some concerns

    I had a similar problem at home and ended up putting 3off 58x22 DIN rail fuse carriers in a sturdy DIN rail box together with a switch disconnector, a bus-bar and a few DIN rail terminal blocks. It does have the disadvantage of not being able to show on paper that it conforms with the various assembly standards. The only 'proper' approach I can think of of supplying several submains from HBC fuses without spending silly money is a few separate switchfuses and henley blocks (perhaps with a bit of trunking for the tails to make it looks a bit less like a dog's dinner) . That was one of the issues that the fictional "Concept" CU range was meant to address.

       - Andy.

  • I have just looked at a few fuse holders. Interesting to note that Eaton at least recommend only connecting high temperature wire, which when I think about it makes sense. Probably also means that plastic cases may be a bad idea. I still don't think there are any plastic IP65 enclosures on the market that include busbars capable of taking 16mm cable.

    From what I can see the smaller plastic switch fuses like the one below don't really work for terminating round xlpe cables and certainly not armoured cables. I also wonder how they would handle sitting at full load for 12 plus hours with a couple of cars charging.

    Which would force larger enclosures such as 

    At which point it's probably better to put multiple fuses in a larger frame. 3 phase units have quite a bit of space inside, presumably to deal with heat issues and I have seen that eaton suggest using high temperature wires for connections.

    In some ways using mcb's has it's appeal because presumably they won't generate as much heat when running close to limits. If a C curve was used what's the chance of nuisance tripping.

Reply
  • I have just looked at a few fuse holders. Interesting to note that Eaton at least recommend only connecting high temperature wire, which when I think about it makes sense. Probably also means that plastic cases may be a bad idea. I still don't think there are any plastic IP65 enclosures on the market that include busbars capable of taking 16mm cable.

    From what I can see the smaller plastic switch fuses like the one below don't really work for terminating round xlpe cables and certainly not armoured cables. I also wonder how they would handle sitting at full load for 12 plus hours with a couple of cars charging.

    Which would force larger enclosures such as 

    At which point it's probably better to put multiple fuses in a larger frame. 3 phase units have quite a bit of space inside, presumably to deal with heat issues and I have seen that eaton suggest using high temperature wires for connections.

    In some ways using mcb's has it's appeal because presumably they won't generate as much heat when running close to limits. If a C curve was used what's the chance of nuisance tripping.

Children
No Data