This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Exported PME to steel floodlight columns, public tennis courts

Hi

We're doing an EICR at a local tennis club. It has a number of  3 phase floodlights mounted on galavanised columns illuminatimg outdoor tennis courts.

They are earthed via an exported PME TNCS system which was surprising because we'd imagined they would have sunk an earth rod at each column and not exported the PME.

The location is open to the public. Circuits not 30mA RCD protected foir additional protection.

I'm no

Many Thanks for your help

Parents
  • 30 mA RCD protection is an absolute requirement for lighting in a pub garden, there’s no way anyone could argue that it doesn’t come under indent (i) Gardens, spaces open to the public.

    I am fairly confident that the requirement covers a tennis club and courts as well.

    But it's not an absolute requirement as stated - it's conditional on the lighting being accessible and not of the kind listed as excluded (which includes street lighting). It still seems to me that a light fitting on the top of a 5m or whatever pole isn't accessible to the public. The pole itself, even it metallic and bonded, isn't any more hazardous than any exposed- or extraneous-conductive-part and I don't see any additional protection being demanded for outside taps.

       - Andy.

Reply
  • 30 mA RCD protection is an absolute requirement for lighting in a pub garden, there’s no way anyone could argue that it doesn’t come under indent (i) Gardens, spaces open to the public.

    I am fairly confident that the requirement covers a tennis club and courts as well.

    But it's not an absolute requirement as stated - it's conditional on the lighting being accessible and not of the kind listed as excluded (which includes street lighting). It still seems to me that a light fitting on the top of a 5m or whatever pole isn't accessible to the public. The pole itself, even it metallic and bonded, isn't any more hazardous than any exposed- or extraneous-conductive-part and I don't see any additional protection being demanded for outside taps.

       - Andy.

Children
No Data