Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Helpful Answer
  • Replies 118 replies
  • Subscribers 48 subscribers
  • Views 27255 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in

Tackling AFDD Tripping

sparkiemike

How are people tacking AFDD tripping?

In the past if I had a call out for a tripping RCD/RCBO or MCB there are well established procedures and tools to track down the fault.

These range from the visual inspection, insulation resistance testing, earth leakage measurement, RCD ramp testing and RCD time testing. It would not take too long to track down the fault whether it was faulty appliance, water ingress, damaged cable or even a duff protective device. The repair might have taken a bit longer but at least you knew where the fault was.

I had a call out this weekend for a AFDD that was tripping on a ring circuit. The new consumer unit (with 3- AFDDs, RCBOS and surge protection) has been in service the end of November and no issues reported. The customer did his own diagnosing and suspected the fridge/freezer as the circuit stopped tripping when he removed the appliance from the circuit. However, when he plugged the fridge/freezer in to another ring circuit with AFDD protection via a extension lead on a reel it did not trip. At this point I did not know what type of fault it was as the customer did not make a note of LED status on the AFDD.

The fridge has no damage and continuity and insulation resting testing all OK

Ring circuit was intact and insulation testing OK (greater than 500Mohm). The instrument readings were exactly the same as they were at the end of November. Plugged it back in and no tripping. I also ran a 1.8kW load on the same socket for a few minutes to see if I could get it to trip -  all OK.

Ten minutes after leaving the circuit tripped, I returned and from the flashing light sequence on the AFDD it was definitely an ARC fault. Reset the breaker and is was tripping regularly every few minutes.

I plugged in the fridge into another circuit, but this time with my much shorter extension lead. Then proceeded to inspect all sockets and checking tightness of terminals - no issues. Although there are some terminations not accessible for inspection.

Then I noticed the other circuit tripped (with fridge connected via extension lead) - so the conclusion that it is definitely the fridge. As the fridge/freezer is still under warrantee I advised the customer to contact the manufacturer. He plugged it into the original circuit in the hope to keep it running. It did not and I told him again to not run the fridge.

Later that night I get a message that now the other circuit is tripping every time they use the microwave -  not the circuit with the fridge and apparently fridge not plugged in.

At the moment I am not 100% sure it is the fridge and can't rule out a faulty AFDD or has the faulty fridge caused the  microprocessor in the AFDD to go faulty.

As a last resort I told them to switch off all circuits and main-switch and then switch-on one by one. Thinking that these devices have microprocessors maybe they need a restart every now and again - bit like my router at home.

Any suggestions on diagnosing ARC faults?

Parents
  • 0

    So let's take stock.

    Is anybody persuaded that AFDD would have saved Grenfell?

    Is nuisance tripping a significant phenomenon?

    It would be lovely to have a show of hands. Has anybody in here installed that at home? (I made further progress with my own installation today, but AFDDs are nowhere to be seen.)

  • 0 in reply to Chris Pearson

    Not me. Although I am intrigued as to exactly where this 'crimp' was actually situated. Was it a manufacturer's joint inside the fridge? Or was it in the appliance flex to enable the lead to reach a socket outlet? The report seems to be at odds with itself in places as to whether or the the crimp was the root cause.

    As for AFDDs saving the day? How could it be proved either way? Hager are going down the same route as many motor vehicle makers - 'Sell the service and not the product', is the new mantra. No money to be made in selling the vehicle, rather, why not sell a monthly paid app to enable certain features instead? It is a akin to buying a loaf of bread, yet having got it home you have to pay an app firstly to open the package, then pay another on a slice by slice basis as you consume it.

    Personally, I dislike the introduction of smart and other electronics into mains kit just to enable data gathering. Although not mains, the fact that a otherwise mechanically sound motor vehicle can be rendered useless because some sensor or other decides that the levels of certain gases emitted from the exhaust pipe are out of range, or that the thing itself simply fails, is reason enough to simplify and get rid of the weak links in the chain.

  • 0 in reply to whjohnson

    My understanding is that the crimp with the voids in the CT scans was a crimp as part of a spade terminal connector to what he refers to as the starter relay - which is actually a thermal thing that releases the start capacitor once up to speed. In any case one of the fridge freezer makers factory crimps.

    But as I have said before, given that amount of damage it would be a brave soul who spoke with more than 'perhaps' or 'probably' . This caution leads to the slightly contradictory statements that more than one thing might be true.

    I'm with you on the AFDD being useless in this case, and indeed a great many cases.   It may even make things worse if folk decide an AFDD means you can be more careless.

    As for Dave Savery's results, while the language is a bit unprofessional, I'd agree the fact the thing does not trip under the conditions shown is scarcely confidence inspiring, and suggests the euronorm to which the things are tested is inadequate as I'm sure it passes that.

    Mike

Reply
  • 0 in reply to whjohnson

    My understanding is that the crimp with the voids in the CT scans was a crimp as part of a spade terminal connector to what he refers to as the starter relay - which is actually a thermal thing that releases the start capacitor once up to speed. In any case one of the fridge freezer makers factory crimps.

    But as I have said before, given that amount of damage it would be a brave soul who spoke with more than 'perhaps' or 'probably' . This caution leads to the slightly contradictory statements that more than one thing might be true.

    I'm with you on the AFDD being useless in this case, and indeed a great many cases.   It may even make things worse if folk decide an AFDD means you can be more careless.

    As for Dave Savery's results, while the language is a bit unprofessional, I'd agree the fact the thing does not trip under the conditions shown is scarcely confidence inspiring, and suggests the euronorm to which the things are tested is inadequate as I'm sure it passes that.

    Mike

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines