This is a question that came up in a face book page, someone stated that a double pole RCBO is safer than a SP+N RCBO and personally I couldn't see why one was safer than the other.

My interpretation of the post was 

SP+N  detects L/N imbalance same as any other RCBO but switches L and N

Double pole as above but also detects overload on line or neutral.

Maybe my interpretation/understanding is incorrect?

I can see that there could be a possible advantage in 3 phase environments with 4 pole devices because without thinking too much I assume the neutral current could exceed the line current.

But in single phase circuits from my thinking at least if the line and neutral current are imbalance the imbalance would cause a trip, therefore there is no additional value in monitoring load on the neutral.

Therefore in my mind a SP+N RCD is an acceptable replacement for a double pole RCD, for example for EV charger installs.

Thinking this through further and doing a bit more digging I am coming to the conclusion that a double pole RCBO as I have described above doesn't exist and it's just manufacturers using a different name for the same thing.

Or am I missing something?