Earth Potential Rise risk with TT earth close to Pole Transformer.

I'm looking at the risks associated with Earth Potential Rise Risk in TT an installation close to a Pole Transformer. I have read from the various DNO's they specify a distance between the HV earth and the LV earth, this I'm taking is to avoid the EPR from the HV side being transferred to the earth of the LV side.

This is based on sites being close to or within the distances mentioned above.

I have seen sites that have a DNO TN-C-S earth provided, but there seems a risk. In the event of the HV fault, even if the separation between the LV and the HV earths to reduce the EPR transfer to a safe potential. In the TN-C-S earth there will be a voltage on the earth from the HV fault, this voltage will be present at the DNO head cut out. Which will effectively cause a potential between the DNO earth and local earth.

I would consider a TT earth to mitigate the above. While the earth will bring in the Local earth voltage if there is one from the EPR from a HV Fault, it will effectively create a equipotential zone at what evert the EPR is at that point.

Any advise or references would be greatly appreciated.

Parents
  • this voltage will be present at the DNO head cut out. Which will effectively cause a potential between the DNO earth and local earth.

    I would consider a TT earth to mitigate the above.

    Pros and cons. TT keeps your earthing system close to 0V if you like, but L & N will still be referenced to the substation's (transformer) earth - so while there's less of a p.d. between PE and true earth in your installation, there can be a very big difference between L/N and PE - so the risk of damage to equipment can be significantly higher (especially stuff that references PE for functional reasons - e.g. things with EMI filters or some Data/telecoms equipment).

    On a TN system L/N/PE would all go up and down together as it were - and as long as you're within an equipotential zone, the shock risk isn't any higher.

        - Andy.

Reply
  • this voltage will be present at the DNO head cut out. Which will effectively cause a potential between the DNO earth and local earth.

    I would consider a TT earth to mitigate the above.

    Pros and cons. TT keeps your earthing system close to 0V if you like, but L & N will still be referenced to the substation's (transformer) earth - so while there's less of a p.d. between PE and true earth in your installation, there can be a very big difference between L/N and PE - so the risk of damage to equipment can be significantly higher (especially stuff that references PE for functional reasons - e.g. things with EMI filters or some Data/telecoms equipment).

    On a TN system L/N/PE would all go up and down together as it were - and as long as you're within an equipotential zone, the shock risk isn't any higher.

        - Andy.

Children
No Data