Isolation Transformer and its Secondary Protection

When using an isolation transformer in a control panel. in this case for  a motor heater, I think I should probably tie 0V to earth within the control panel.

- I would also like to protect the secondary, however what are the rules here, do you have to provide 2P MCB?

-Obviously I have an upstream 2P MCB of the transformer.

- I would think its perfectly OK to use only a single pole on MCB on the line side output of the transformer?

Does anybody have any comments on this?

Parents
  • Not sure what this means "functional requirements about earthing

    Just the some applications require the 'supply' to be earthed - e.g. some older (ELV) data/signalling systems that use chassis return, or things like flame failure monitoring devices.

    For a 110V circuit supplying  a small heater you'd have a fair bit of flexibility. Earthing one pole and having a single pole overcurrent device in the other may well be reasonable. If it came under BS 7671 you'd probably be looking at having to achieve 0.8s disconnection time for ADS (which might be a bit of a challenge, especially given the added impedance of the transformer) and possibly a bit OTT if it's essentially part of a overall bit of equipment that perhaps only has to achieve 5s disconnection times, but I strongly suspect it'll fall under another (equipment) standard, that'll have slightly different requirements.

    I'm sure someone here will know which is likely to be an appropriate standard - I'd maybe guess BS EN 60204 - but that's only a guess and I don't know the detail of what it says.

        - Andy.

Reply
  • Not sure what this means "functional requirements about earthing

    Just the some applications require the 'supply' to be earthed - e.g. some older (ELV) data/signalling systems that use chassis return, or things like flame failure monitoring devices.

    For a 110V circuit supplying  a small heater you'd have a fair bit of flexibility. Earthing one pole and having a single pole overcurrent device in the other may well be reasonable. If it came under BS 7671 you'd probably be looking at having to achieve 0.8s disconnection time for ADS (which might be a bit of a challenge, especially given the added impedance of the transformer) and possibly a bit OTT if it's essentially part of a overall bit of equipment that perhaps only has to achieve 5s disconnection times, but I strongly suspect it'll fall under another (equipment) standard, that'll have slightly different requirements.

    I'm sure someone here will know which is likely to be an appropriate standard - I'd maybe guess BS EN 60204 - but that's only a guess and I don't know the detail of what it says.

        - Andy.

Children
No Data