Diverted neutral current / broken PEN?

Hello all,

Diverted Neutral Currents (DNC) seem to be a big area for debate especially with the push for EV's and the implications that they can cause.

Are there any official figures regarding contacting the DNO regarding these DNC's or recording of it other than on testing documentation (EIC/EICR etc.) ?

This still seems to be an area that needs more information, as variations including the location of the fault, the time of day, year etc. when the test was completed.

If testing a standard PME 100A single phase domestic supply and getting around 8mA on the earthing conductor during the installation being switched on and then reduces 0.01mA when the installation is isolated will probably be more to do with the instrument and 0.01mA = 0.00001A and would indicate that there is no issue. If this stayed at 8mA (0.008A) this is potentially an issue with a broken/deteriorating PEN conductor, however this could change due to variations across neighbouring installations.

When completing this test prior to any other work on the installation and getting readings when not expecting them this is going to impact on any electrical work being carried out, what is deemed as notifiable to the DNO? 

I have heard of anything 5A and above being reportable to the DNO which seems reasonable, however what if you were to get a reading of 4.5A, due to those variations this could be higher taking it beyond the 5A at other points in the day etc.

Would it be more appropriate to have anything above 1A reportable to the DNO so they can make their checks and note this on the job/ testing documentation, and where does it become a safety issue regarding work in/on the installation with a broken/deteriorating PEN conductor, as a job could be completed and several weeks later an incident could occur due to further loading and changes to an installation?

There is lots of information, about how and why etc, but no physical figures, I am aware that Smart metering maybe able to measure volts/current/power etc however this still seems a little vague.

Parents
  • On reading alot of comments, I'm still not aware of data being collated on the subject. Only when a serious incident happens does it come to light. On the HSE Web site there isn't a such  a clear path to follow. 

    Until today, sorry for my ignorance I didn't know the ESQCR  came under the HSE. Under the regulations the DNOs are required to inform the secretary of state of any injuries,including electrocution. However if I don't see where myself as an electricain or a gas fitter( which had the greater risk) to report just the findings of a broken PEN. 

    There for a have emailed the ESQCR Adim  at the HSE for a response . If I here form them I will pass on

    Alan 

Reply
  • On reading alot of comments, I'm still not aware of data being collated on the subject. Only when a serious incident happens does it come to light. On the HSE Web site there isn't a such  a clear path to follow. 

    Until today, sorry for my ignorance I didn't know the ESQCR  came under the HSE. Under the regulations the DNOs are required to inform the secretary of state of any injuries,including electrocution. However if I don't see where myself as an electricain or a gas fitter( which had the greater risk) to report just the findings of a broken PEN. 

    There for a have emailed the ESQCR Adim  at the HSE for a response . If I here form them I will pass on

    Alan 

Children
No Data