Cables in ducts - Derating factor for cable grouping - Wiring and the Regulations BS 7671 - IET EngX - IET EngX

# Cables in ducts - Derating factor for cable grouping

Hello all. I'm having one of those moments where everything I thought I knew is wrong.

I need some advice on cable derating factor (Cg) when running cables in underground ducts. I'll provide a hypothetical example to help with my question:

I have a switchboard at one end of a set of 4 power cable ducts, and 9 items of equipment requiring power at the other end.

Lets assume the ducts are:

• Approx 25m long (voltage drop and Zs are unlikely to be an issue).
• 150mm diameter.
• Are in a cluster, 2 ducts on top, 2 on the bottom, seperated 100mm in each direcfion.
• All circuits will be 'ON' at the same time.
• We don't need to discuss soil temperature or anything like that - just the grouping factor, Cg

Let assume the 9 circuits are spread evenly across 3 of the ducts, with the 4th duct left spare - so 3 cables in 3 of the ducts.

For my derating factor Cg for each cable, is this based on 3 cables in a group, or 9 cables in a group?

Many thanks in advance for any asistance

Parents
• The degree of cooling will also depend on the length of the duct and how much free flow of air you expect to have although as the run gets longer, that effect gets less significant , and if you expect the ground  to be wet or not( and I suppose  if the ducts end up being full of water - in some installations they can be)

If they were much further apart - a few duct diameters, they would  be considered completely thermally independent, but in this case they are weakly coupled, but nothing like as strongly coupled as they would be if all cabling was in one (bigger) duct.

As has already been mentioned this weakly coupled case is not one covered in the standard tables and either assuming one large group (oversizing), or some intelligent interpolation between the one duct and the widely spaced ducts case will be needed. The problem is that to do this almost certainly needs information you do not have.

Mike.