I won't make a statement regarding suitability of any particular cable in this thread, just point out that:

• Reference: Reg 712.410.102. Double or reinforced insulation is required on the DC side where the inverter has no protective separation between AC and DC sides (i.e. SELV or PELV can't be met), because, if the inverter has no separation between AC and DC sides, effectively you're "shaking hands" with the grid under some conditions as the DC is switched to the AC (quite literally) by the electronics in the inverter (perhaps though inductances etc.). Hence, it could not be
• Reference: Reg 712.521.101. Double or reinforced insulation is required on the DC side to help separate L+ and L- conductors to minimize risk of short-circuit, in parts of the DC side without overcurrent protection (i.e. because there are no fuses at the array). Required to protect against fire, and also possibly in line with 712.410.102 electric shock. The methods exemplified in the standard demonstrate how conductors need to be arranged (each insulation, and then each enclosed either in a sheath or another run of non-conductive containment.
• Regulation 412.2.4.1 is the requirements for wiring systems used where double or reinforced insulation are employed.
• In an SWA cable, there is no insulation or sheath between the armour and the insulated conductors. If it can [ever] be touched it's therefore an extraneous-conductive-part. In an SWA cable.

It's necessary to consider all of the above points when looking for a suitable wiring system for the DC side.

I won't make a statement regarding suitability of any particular cable in this thread, just point out that:

• Reference: Reg 712.410.102. Double or reinforced insulation is required on the DC side where the inverter has no protective separation between AC and DC sides (i.e. SELV or PELV can't be met), because, if the inverter has no separation between AC and DC sides, effectively you're "shaking hands" with the grid under some conditions as the DC is switched to the AC (quite literally) by the electronics in the inverter (perhaps though inductances etc.). Hence, it could not be
• Reference: Reg 712.521.101. Double or reinforced insulation is required on the DC side to help separate L+ and L- conductors to minimize risk of short-circuit, in parts of the DC side without overcurrent protection (i.e. because there are no fuses at the array). Required to protect against fire, and also possibly in line with 712.410.102 electric shock. The methods exemplified in the standard demonstrate how conductors need to be arranged (each insulation, and then each enclosed either in a sheath or another run of non-conductive containment.
• Regulation 412.2.4.1 is the requirements for wiring systems used where double or reinforced insulation are employed.
• In an SWA cable, there is no insulation or sheath between the armour and the insulated conductors. If it can [ever] be touched it's therefore an extraneous-conductive-part. In an SWA cable.

It's necessary to consider all of the above points when looking for a suitable wiring system for the DC side.

Doncaster Cables now produce DC rated SWA cable.  Interested to know your view on this new cable?  https://www.doncastercables.com/uploads/PV-Ultra_Datasheet_.pdf  

It seems it double insulation (or insulated + sheath if you prefer) around each core - so would seem to meet requirements.

But it presumably there's no BS (or equivalent) for that cable type - so it's use would be on the head of the designer and would have to be recorded as a departure on the cert. (133.1.3).

  - Andy.

Had a few discussions about it already.  Likely to be used where damage to cable may occur, what happens if the live conductors faulted to the armour?  And what happens if the armoured is earthed through to the AC side and you end up connecting the DC side to the AC side.  Lots to consider here.