Not sure what to record!
All calibrated around the same time. Three readings taken on each instrument with swapped leads and probes all fairly consistent with photo.
Then move to a socket opened up using same leads;
The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
Actually reading through the post again I guess it may be a three phase supply, because Lyle said the result recorded five years ago was recorded as 1.58X2 so they may be a L-L readings rather than L-N.
But I am quite confident that the testing procedures are comparable.
Making comparative readings between test meters is one of the three methods given in the EAS specification for ensuring the ongoing accuracy of test meters, so Lyle is complying with the EAS requirements by taking these readings with three meters and comparing the results, but I'm not sure what he is going to write in the test meter log books.
Actually reading through the post again I guess it may be a three phase supply, because Lyle said the result recorded five years ago was recorded as 1.58X2 so they may be a L-L readings rather than L-N.
But I am quite confident that the testing procedures are comparable.
Making comparative readings between test meters is one of the three methods given in the EAS specification for ensuring the ongoing accuracy of test meters, so Lyle is complying with the EAS requirements by taking these readings with three meters and comparing the results, but I'm not sure what he is going to write in the test meter log books.
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement