The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 21 replies
  • Subscribers 40 subscribers
  • Views 3794 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Ipf result

lyledunn

Not sure what to record! 

All calibrated around the same time. Three readings taken on each instrument with swapped leads and probes all fairly consistent with photo.

Then move to a socket opened up using same leads;

  • 0 in reply to gkenyon

    they wont be the same, but they may become more closely bunched. The 0.7 ohm cluster is almost spread over the full official spec - should be 5% +/- 5 digits, so 0.7 +-0.035+.05 or any where between 0.7+/-0.085  covers 0.615 to 0.785, while the measured spread is .77-.64 or 130 miliohms

    The spread on the lower readings is almost the same, with the newer '71 unit reading about 180 milliohms below the higher of the others - which to me says systematic error, like leads.

    Mike

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines