Neutral Isolation. A Safety Necessity or a Practical Nightmare?

How should regulation 537.2.1.7 be interpreted and applied? This regulation, which I believe has been deleted but is still being followed by some, requires the neutral to be isolated with a linked switch or removable link when carrying out isolation. However, this can cause a lot of trouble and inconvenience, especially for 24/7 departments that need continuous power. The Lead Engineer argues that both supplies, essential and non-essential, need to be isolated to work on the Essential Line side isolator, where the neutral is linked between the line and load. But is this really necessary? Regulation 531.2.2 allows the neutral to remain connected if it can be reliably assumed to be at earth potential. Can this be verified prior to work commencing by a simple calculation of Un-E = neutral current x Zn (TN-S) or a voltage test between neutral and earth? Some suggest that these methods are sufficient and practical, and that isolating the neutral is unnecessary and impractical. Others assert that these methods are not reliable and safe, and that isolating the neutral is essential for safety reasons, even in a well balanced 3 phase system having minimal neutral current and a low Zn. What is your view?

Parents
  • I teach safe isolation and after I have done the fire alarm drill and where the WCs are I usually kick off with there is no such thing as safe isolation.

    Looking at the EAWR 1989 Regulations 12, 13 and 14 and the guidance in the HSE HSR25 sets out the fundamental principles and the Statutory Requirement. The Management of Health and safety at Work Regulations 1999 make a Statutory requirement to carry out a risk assessment and to produce a Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS). So no activity should take place until the RAMS is produced and the relevant person(s) have been instructed.

    Additional Guidance for safe isolation may be found in IET Gudance Notes 2 and 3 and also the Electricians Guide to the Building Regulations. The IET guidance is to use a sensitive clamp meter around main protective bonding conductors as part of safe isolation procedures to detect the loss of PEN continuity. 

    The original post asks about isolation of the neutral. I really do not like the statement, "Can this be verified prior to work commencing by a simple calculation of Un-E = neutral current x Zn (TN-S) or a voltage test between neutral and earth" You cannot verify safe isolation by calculation.

    As for disconnection of the neutral Regulation 12(2) says disconnected and separation of the electrical equipment from every source of electrical energy. Is the neutral a source of electrical energy, discuss?

    Isolation of the neutral or removal of a neutral link may in itself cause a shock hazard. If there are borrowed neutrals on the installation, when say a DB is isolated with a 4 pole switch the neutral is disconnected, that part of the installation may appear to be safe when tested but then may become live later when a load is switched on with a borrowed neutral. So you may have proved dead at a moment in time. 

    When I have isolated big Form 4 panels that have incoming 4 pole ACBs  and even when the HV is isolated I will earth down the neutral. I remember working on a big site with 2 x a very large Form 4 Panel with a close coupled 11kV transformer supplied from a 33kV transformer and an on site engineer telling me as the RMU was isolated and earthed out I did not need to apply an earth on the neutral, I spent a bit of time explaining why I had earthed the neutral.

    Removing neutral links should be carried out as live working with PPE and insulated tools and a volt stick to warn if live when disconnected.

    Even with the supply isolated and maybe the supply fuses removed the installation may become live due to connections to other installations via bonding conductors.

    I know of incidents from 2 particular industries I work with where metal street cabinets have become live through PEN conductor loss. The engineers now use a volt stick before they touch the street cabinet. 

    So in summary it may not be a safe idea to disconnect the neutral depending on what the RAMS says.

    I would advise to treat all installations as live at all times and keep a good quality volt stick clipped to the top of your shirt for ready and frequent use before you touch anything.

    That is my brief synopsis of safe isolation not a comprehensive  lecture on how to do it!

    JP

Reply
  • I teach safe isolation and after I have done the fire alarm drill and where the WCs are I usually kick off with there is no such thing as safe isolation.

    Looking at the EAWR 1989 Regulations 12, 13 and 14 and the guidance in the HSE HSR25 sets out the fundamental principles and the Statutory Requirement. The Management of Health and safety at Work Regulations 1999 make a Statutory requirement to carry out a risk assessment and to produce a Risk Assessment and Method Statement (RAMS). So no activity should take place until the RAMS is produced and the relevant person(s) have been instructed.

    Additional Guidance for safe isolation may be found in IET Gudance Notes 2 and 3 and also the Electricians Guide to the Building Regulations. The IET guidance is to use a sensitive clamp meter around main protective bonding conductors as part of safe isolation procedures to detect the loss of PEN continuity. 

    The original post asks about isolation of the neutral. I really do not like the statement, "Can this be verified prior to work commencing by a simple calculation of Un-E = neutral current x Zn (TN-S) or a voltage test between neutral and earth" You cannot verify safe isolation by calculation.

    As for disconnection of the neutral Regulation 12(2) says disconnected and separation of the electrical equipment from every source of electrical energy. Is the neutral a source of electrical energy, discuss?

    Isolation of the neutral or removal of a neutral link may in itself cause a shock hazard. If there are borrowed neutrals on the installation, when say a DB is isolated with a 4 pole switch the neutral is disconnected, that part of the installation may appear to be safe when tested but then may become live later when a load is switched on with a borrowed neutral. So you may have proved dead at a moment in time. 

    When I have isolated big Form 4 panels that have incoming 4 pole ACBs  and even when the HV is isolated I will earth down the neutral. I remember working on a big site with 2 x a very large Form 4 Panel with a close coupled 11kV transformer supplied from a 33kV transformer and an on site engineer telling me as the RMU was isolated and earthed out I did not need to apply an earth on the neutral, I spent a bit of time explaining why I had earthed the neutral.

    Removing neutral links should be carried out as live working with PPE and insulated tools and a volt stick to warn if live when disconnected.

    Even with the supply isolated and maybe the supply fuses removed the installation may become live due to connections to other installations via bonding conductors.

    I know of incidents from 2 particular industries I work with where metal street cabinets have become live through PEN conductor loss. The engineers now use a volt stick before they touch the street cabinet. 

    So in summary it may not be a safe idea to disconnect the neutral depending on what the RAMS says.

    I would advise to treat all installations as live at all times and keep a good quality volt stick clipped to the top of your shirt for ready and frequent use before you touch anything.

    That is my brief synopsis of safe isolation not a comprehensive  lecture on how to do it!

    JP

Children
  • Is the neutral a source of electrical energy, discuss?

    Yes, it can be. When I first encountered it, I could not understand why cutting some T&E on an isolated (and locked off) circuit tripped the RCD. I eventually realised that the neutral was sufficiently above earth potential in the TT installation to allow circa 30 mA (or more) to flow.

    In this particular domestic case, the amount of electrical energy was small, but not zero.

    So you may have proved dead at a moment in time.

    With all due respect, John, delete, "may".

  • I think I should leave the may in. This is the story of Colin who proved dead to replace a light fitting at the request of his wife. Having apparently proved dead he climbed the steps and when disconnecting the original light fitting he received a shock and fell from the ladder.

    The sequence was switch on light. Go to the consumer unit and switch off the MCB and the light went out. Tested 2 pole tester before use.Tested with a 2 pole tester between line and neutral, line and earth and neutral and earth all indicated no voltage. 

    So what happened to cause this? He went to hospital and was off sick for an extended period. He is a qualified electrician.

    JP

  • A JP brain-teaser!

    I take the point, but for a start, he has not proved dead if he did not test the tester as the last stage.

  • I assume either

    1) supply reverse polarity or perhaps the MCB in the neutral and an off-earth if nothing else was happening and shock to terra-frma

    or

    2) the neutral was also carrying current back to the board originating from another circuit breaker and when the loop-in loop out path was broken, a voltage between the two  open ends existed.

    I'd hope both unlikely to go un-noticed  in an electrician's own home you would hope but maybe not if not inspected since moved in..

    Mike

  • After watching a full season of “Shetland”, my money is on the wife!

  • Is the neutral a source of electrical energy

    Yes it is possible.

    Years ago in the UK we had the

    Live, Neutral and Earth

    We now have

    Line, Neutral and CPC ( I am talking domestic)

    LIVE conductors now refer to Line and Neutral (or L1,L2,L3&N in 3 pahse).  Personally I think that in time CPC will be added to this list of LIVE conductors or should we say Possible LIVE Conductors.  Think about Earth leakage currents and PEN faults.

    Is the neutral a source of electrical energy

    Yes....Consider

    Shared neutral in a lighting circuit with no RCBO in domestic scenario.  (MCB tolorate shared neutral but RCBO will not)

    Missing identified or labled conductors from CU to fitting

    Missing identified or labled conductors from Main service cut out to CU

    Missing identified or labled conductors from Meter to CU

    Pen fault in property and down the road

    Off peak tarrif or timer circuit kicks in at time of work but after test for dead

    Solar PV on roof

    Battery storage

  • You have explained it very clearly; I want to add when the Electricians carry secure isolation, they have to understand the difference between neutrals in the TN-C and TN-C-S systems. As it connects to Earth at the source and TT system, each property has its own Earth Rod system.

    Guidance Note 3 shows clearly the difference in the diagram 

    Thanks

    Arya