Neutral Isolation. A Safety Necessity or a Practical Nightmare?

How should regulation 537.2.1.7 be interpreted and applied? This regulation, which I believe has been deleted but is still being followed by some, requires the neutral to be isolated with a linked switch or removable link when carrying out isolation. However, this can cause a lot of trouble and inconvenience, especially for 24/7 departments that need continuous power. The Lead Engineer argues that both supplies, essential and non-essential, need to be isolated to work on the Essential Line side isolator, where the neutral is linked between the line and load. But is this really necessary? Regulation 531.2.2 allows the neutral to remain connected if it can be reliably assumed to be at earth potential. Can this be verified prior to work commencing by a simple calculation of Un-E = neutral current x Zn (TN-S) or a voltage test between neutral and earth? Some suggest that these methods are sufficient and practical, and that isolating the neutral is unnecessary and impractical. Others assert that these methods are not reliable and safe, and that isolating the neutral is essential for safety reasons, even in a well balanced 3 phase system having minimal neutral current and a low Zn. What is your view?

Parents
  • How should regulation 537.2.1.7 be interpreted and applied?

    There is no such Regulation in BS 7671:2018+A2:2022 or BS 7671:2018, so the short answer is that it is neither interpreted nor applied - there has been no such Regulation for over 5 years!

    However, 537.2.6 and 461.2 together effectively replace the requirement.

    The parts of BS 7671 regarding isolation and switching were completely revised, and split into Chapter 46 and Chapter 53 (see page 5 of BS 7671:2018+A2:2022).

    Regulation 531.2.2 allows the neutral to remain connected if it can be reliably assumed to be at earth potential.

    And more fundamentally, Regulation 461.2 ? This also requires equipotential bonding to be in place. Some might argue that if there are no extraneous-conductive-parts, there is no equipotential bonding, so the neutral requires isolation regardless of the supply type and earthing arrangements.

    Regardless of all that, in installations where the main switch at the origin is intended for operation by ordinary persons, if the supply is single-phase, the neutral must be disconnected (Regulation 462.1.201).

    Some suggest that these methods are sufficient and practical, and that isolating the neutral is unnecessary and impractical.

    Further, if you provide a separate neutral disconnecting link and fail to re-instate before re-energizing, that can be very dangerous in a three-phase system (see Regulations 431.3 and 442.3).

    The Lead Engineer argues that both supplies, essential and non-essential, need to be isolated to work on the Essential Line side isolator, where the neutral is linked between the line and load. But is this really necessary?

    I think that would be down to how one interprets Regulation 461.2 ...

  • years!

    However, 537.2.6 and 461.2 together effectively replace the requirement.

    Do you understand 462.1? I don’t, neither for that matter do the technical bods at NICEIC. I would love to understand the latter part of that regulation!

Reply
  • years!

    However, 537.2.6 and 461.2 together effectively replace the requirement.

    Do you understand 462.1? I don’t, neither for that matter do the technical bods at NICEIC. I would love to understand the latter part of that regulation!

Children
No Data