Is my theory about earthing correct?

Had a discussion with my colleagues at work today around the theory of removing all earthing. 

This is my question:

If I poke my finger into the live terminal of a 230v socket, the line current travels through me, through the floor (earth), back through the earth to the supply transformer (because the transformer star point is also tied down to the general mass of earth) the fault currents travel back into the transformer star point and hopefully the completed path is of low enough impedance to be able to blow or trip the protective device serving the socket I touched.

Now. If the transformer star point WAS NOT connected down to earth, there would NOT be a return path from the socket I've stuck my finger in, back into the star point of the transformer and I wouldn't be able to recieve a shock as there is no complete return path.

Is that correct or not?

So following on from that, my question is: why cant we just isolate all transformers from earth and remove the risk of a "line to earth" shock? After all, this is exactly why we use SELV transformers in bathrooms no???? 

Obviously you could still get a line to neutral shock, but that's got nothing to do with the question I'm asking here. 

Parents
  • IT system or TN system? I believe Norway mostly uses IT in distribution. Is one advantage of TN lower cost and less equipment? I think both earthing arrangements have advantages and disadvantages for different applications.

Reply
  • IT system or TN system? I believe Norway mostly uses IT in distribution. Is one advantage of TN lower cost and less equipment? I think both earthing arrangements have advantages and disadvantages for different applications.

Children
No Data