This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Multi branch radial circuit terminating into DB

I have been informed that we can no longer terminate two or more branches of a radial circuit into the DB/CU. Because of increased fault currents potentially exceeding the breaking capacity of the protective device, if there were two simultaneous faults on the two branches. But it is still acceptable to split the radial into branches when it leaves the DB/CU after the first point of utilisation(which could be very close to the origin of the circuit). I am struggling to understand the significant difference in fault currents between these two scenarios. I was directed to Fig15B in the big book, where it no longer depicts a radial circuit's two branches connected to the DB/CU. Does that potentially small length of the radial circuit's conductors at the beginning of the circuit, before it branches, add enough extra impedance to make a difference?

Parents
  • Joy Not from YouTube! It was on an annual assessment. The circuit in question was a 20A radial supply socket outlets and the like, wired with two branches into the circuit breaker. The only reference cited was Fig15B. Maybe I misunderstood what was being said, but I don't think so. Thinking

  • That is rather worrying!

    Suppose that two appliances on consecutive sockets shorted simultaneously. Would that make a difference?

Reply
  • That is rather worrying!

    Suppose that two appliances on consecutive sockets shorted simultaneously. Would that make a difference?

Children
No Data