Safety Device Isolation Options for Induction Hobs

I'm currently producing feasibility studies for replacement hobs within student accommodation. The replacement of the hob is straight forward enough, but the client has is looking for additional safety devices to isolate the hobs if a problem should arise. This will be alongside isolation switches above the counter and also RCBOs at the DB. The initial idea this:

https://www.kitchenstoveguard.co.uk/stove-guard/

I don't have much confidence in the information on this product. Claiming that the battery will last 10 years, and that there is no need for monthly testing.

If anyone has any advice on this product or similar, or even another method I'd like to hear it.

Thanks

Parents
  • It seems Norway is leading the way with this type of equipment and there are various products available.


    Norway
    has a building code standard from 1 July 2011 shut-off devices are required in new electric stove installations (Norwegian standard NEK 400:2010 Electrical low voltage installations. Part 400-8-823 residential buildings).

  • Interesting. I see they do not consider normal fire/smoke alarms sensitive enough.

    round here they seem to be too sensitive but hey-ho.

    translating from here

    "823.421 Protection against fire caused by electrical equipment

    823.421.01 Cooker/hob To reduce the risk of fire when using the hob (as an independent unit or as an integrated in a stove) protective measures must be arranged in the fixed installation, which ensure disconnecting the power supply to the hob if danger arises when using the hob for overheating. The protective equipment must be permanently mounted.

    GUIDELINE 1 – The protective measure can be arranged, for example, by installing a separate over-temperature monitoring equipment (for example, directly above the cooker/hob) which causes the equipment to be switched off and indicates this with a sound and light signal. Ordinary fire detectors/smoke alarms in the ceiling will not normally work quickly enough.

    GUIDELINE 2 – A time switch is not to be considered a device that protects against overheating. The protective equipment must be of class B or class AB in accordance with NEK EN 50615.

    GUIDELINE 3 - The purpose of the requirement in section 823.421.01 is to prevent a fire occurring due to use of one cooker/hob. The intention is that the protective measure should be effective in every situation and use hob/stove, and an important element of this lies in the fact that it is not possible either accidentally or in a simple way to disable the measure. The following points show how the intentions of the requirement in 823.421.01 are taken care of that the protective measure: is part of the permanent electrical installation, cannot be taken out of operation without intervention in the electrical installation, actively monitors the temperature progress of what is being cooked on the hob and prevents overheating where possible entail a risk of fire,  disconnects the power to the hob when danger occurs, and indicates disconnection with a sound and light signal, gives, if the sensor has a battery, a signal for a period when the battery needs to be replaced,  if the battery is empty or not installed, switch off the power supply to the stove, and can be manually overridden in an emergency, for example in the event of a sensor failure or similar."

    It would be interesting to know  if their kitchen fire accident rate has fallen much since this got added.

    Mike

  • Maybe they are more stringent due to the amount of dwellings primarily constructed from wood.  The guidelines would certainly be appropriate in student living quarters as would it be for older/vunerable people. It sounds like our Norwegian cousins have some sound engineering judgement.

Reply
  • Maybe they are more stringent due to the amount of dwellings primarily constructed from wood.  The guidelines would certainly be appropriate in student living quarters as would it be for older/vunerable people. It sounds like our Norwegian cousins have some sound engineering judgement.

Children
No Data