External lighting columns - earthing conductor (reg 714.411.203)

Good afternoon

Sorry for the back to back question about external lighting

Based on regulation 714.411.203:

'Where street furniture is connected directly to a distributor's PME network, the earthing conductor and any main protective bonding conductors to any extraneous-conductive parts shall have a minimum copper equivalent CSA of 6mm2 for PEN conductors of the supply with copper equivalent CSA up to 10mm2. For larger sized neutral conductors, the main bonding shall comply with Table 54.8.'

If I have lighting columns at the back of a building and I am feeding them from inside the building, and the building system is a PME system, does this apply?

Its wording confuses me really because it says about connection directly to a DNO PME network....

Parents
  • Looks to me more like an exposed conductive part.

    Other than it's stuck in the ground, so provides some path to true Earth for diverted neutral currents...

    That said, it's likely to have a ground resistance of several tens of Ohms, so the current flow is likely to be very restricted - so not a huge worry for a single column (but maybe you wouldn't want to rely on the 0.75mm² c.p.c. in a flex to the lighting head).

    Maybe less restricted if you had many columns (long drive to a country mansion) - where the overall resistance of many in parallel could be reduced a fair bit.

    Steel column have been debatable in terms of exposed- or extraneous- for a long time. Are they part of the electrical installation, or just supporting/enclosing it? If you had unsheathed singles inside it should be an exposed-conductive-part and therefore cannot be an extraneous-conductive-part (perhaps counter-intuitively, but that's what the definitions say). If sheathed cables inside, but the column in contact with a class 1 lighting head, then extraneous-conductive-part would seem to fit.

       - Andy.

  • Quite - it is not always clear what the risk is for which we need the CPC .. to carry a diverted neutral current needs a big one, comparing to the DNOC cable, while to blow a fuse doesn't need anything larger than the final circuit  supply rating,  and to trip an RCD probably does not need a CPC at all if the thing is planted in the ground.

    The regs do not really make the distinction.

    mike

Reply
  • Quite - it is not always clear what the risk is for which we need the CPC .. to carry a diverted neutral current needs a big one, comparing to the DNOC cable, while to blow a fuse doesn't need anything larger than the final circuit  supply rating,  and to trip an RCD probably does not need a CPC at all if the thing is planted in the ground.

    The regs do not really make the distinction.

    mike

Children
No Data