Use of Schuko sockets in a UK home only for a HiFi system

Hello everyone,

This is my first post.

I have a question about using Schuko sockets in a UK domestic home.

But first, a bit of background might help.

I am a Member of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. I didn't think my people would be very good at answering this question which is why I am here!

In more detail, I would like to use a Schuko socket to which only my hi-fi system would connect. The socket would be connected to a brand-new consumer unit with RCBO’s. There will also be surge protection. All will be done to the latest standards and specifications by a fully qualified electrician. The wiring diagram would be based on the one in this link: https://www.russandrews.com/images/pdf/MainsWiringGuide111023.pdf

I will also have a regular UK 3-pin socket. I am a reviewer for a HiFi magazine and want to do the above as the basis of an article on HiFi power supplies. 

So back to the question, is there any legal reason (or otherwise) that I can't use the Schuko socket in the UK? 

If the answer is “yes I can”, albeit with specific conditions, I'd like to quote that in my article/review. Especially if the Schuko supply sounds better than the UK 3-pin with fuse!

I am looking forward to your response.

Many thanks

Paul

Parents
  • I think it will also help to understand what you wish to achieve. Do you just want to be able to test/review continental equipment without having to replace the plug in which case a Schuko socket strip with a 13A plug fitted would be sufficient? If you are trying to compare the effects of UK and continental mains supplies there are a lot of differences to consider including the use of lower rated three phase supplies to the continental buildings.

  • There will always be fuses or circuit breakers in the wiring, starting with a, probably 800A fuse, in the substation then a 60 - 100A fuse in your incoming supply. Next will be a 16A fuse or circuit breaker for your Schuko or a 32A RFC fuse/circuit breaker followed by a 13A fuse in the plug. There may well be a further fuse in the equipment. What are you trying to eliminate?

  • True. Also the internal fuses of the HiFi component.

    In the spirit of marginal gains, I’m trying to eliminate and “improve” what I can in a safe and legal way, hence the original question about using Schuko connectors in the UK.

    Once I’m comfortable I can do that, and it looks like I can, I can make a comparison and see if music sounds better.

    The proof is in the pudding, as they say.

  • In the spirit of marginal gains, I’m trying to eliminate and “improve” what I can in a safe and legal way, hence the original question about using Schuko connectors in the UK.

    Once I’m comfortable I can do that, and it looks like I can, I can make a comparison and see if music sounds better.

    Are your ears capable of appreciating such marginal gains? Are we talking about low frequencies or high frequencies? How does the circuit eliminate any form of interference which must, presumably, be coming from elsewhere in the property or the street?

    Not unlawful, but beware of smoke and mirrors!

  • Music is art and art is emotion. So, yes, I can and do hear/ feel the difference in things like power cables.

    If you consider HiFi equipment as extremely high precision data retrieval instruments utilising electricity, one could brainstorm many opportunities to corrupt data retrieval, conversion (digital and analog), amplification and transmission to the speakers. And never have we had so many EMI, EFI and EMC challenges as we do these days.

    I've been reading this book…

    https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/442453/this-is-what-it-sounds-like-by-ogas-dr-susan-rogers-and-ogi/9781529114010

    An interesting fact is the human hearing stops developing at about the age of 14, unless children are exposed to music from a young age and develop a love for music. This leads to the inner hair cells developing dendrites, meaning they hear things other don’t. I need music like the air that I breathe!

    Sorry, I’ve gone off topic!

  • Fair enough. Let us know how you get on,

    Legally, certainly if it is your building and you are sure what you want, you can go for it. In England changes to existing circuits not in the bathroom can be done by anyone and no need to notify the authorities.
     However, new circuits and new consumer units are ' notifiable work' and have to be done by a sparks who can notify by being a scheme member, or anyone can but then they must notify the local council building control, who tend to charge a  lot to inspect to encourage folk away from that route. Its not quite the same in Wales, and its very different in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

    Having a tame 'sparks' makes it very easy.

    Mike.

  • I’m going to use “tame Sparks” in my review!

    Thanks Pray tone4 

  • If you consider HiFi equipment as extremely high precision data retrieval instruments utilising electricity, one could brainstorm many opportunities to corrupt data retrieval, conversion (digital and analog), amplification and transmission to the speakers. And never have we had so many EMI, EFI and EMC challenges as we do these days.

    And the ears and the auditory pathways turn the sound waves back into electricity.

    However, you haven't answered my questions.

    Let's start again with the frequencies which might be affected. Low or high please?

  • I’m going to digress a little..


    In terms of hearing, music is much more than frequencies and frequency response. We know that because people who are lacking in frequency extremes (lots of us) still make and experience amazing music. For example the sense of rhythm has nothing to do with frequencies. It’s a feeling you either get or don’t. There is not right or wrong.

    I guess you are saying, are the improvement measurable? There is a forum called Audio Science Review…

    https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?reviews/

    … who generally believe, if it can’t be measured, it’s not real. I find their forum interesting but I don’t subscribe to “measurement or nothing”.

    So, having said that, where frequencies are being addressed, they tend to be very high frequencies.

    Did I kind of answer your question?

  • One has to be careful - it has been shown that (some) humans are responsive to effects that are quite a long way outside the traditional audio range ( perhaps 10Hz to 20KHz and more like 300 -3000Hz for mobile phone "dalek quality" speech - think mobile 'phone..) 

    Correctly instrumented measurements on audio kit need to include looking for effects up to perhaps 50KHz plus that might be attended by apparently imperceptible  roll-off and small phase errors in band that would generally not be noticed.

    Also some people 'feel' ultrasound effects, even when they do not report hearing them.

    a reference

    I'm firmly in the 'if it can be heard it can be measured' camp by the way, but I would say that for a satisfactory measurement one needs a degree of rigour and precision often lacking,

    Mike.

  • OK, so if your ears cannot perceive very high frequencies, how can you perceive them at all?

Reply Children
  • OK, so if your ears cannot perceive very high frequencies, how can you perceive them at all?

    I guess you can perceive the effect of something even if you can't directly perceive the thing itself. If there were two or more high but different frequencies, I might be able to hear the lower frequency interactions (beat?) as peaks and troughs interfere sometimes constructively sometimes destructively. Sort of Fourier analysis in reverse.

       - Andy.

  • OK, so if your ears cannot perceive very high frequencies, how can you perceive them at all?

    The non-linear mixing of modulated ultrasound is a fairly standard way of casting sound directionally - the 'sound' is only re-created at the point of detection.

    This chap has done it at the party trick level to 'throw' music with 40KHz transducers.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQOabMOMGoE

    the ultrasound  power levels are higher than I would want to be bathed in but hey-ho.

    (google the 'voice of god' weapon for a possible use in warfare, to either instruct some poeple but not others, or to make folk think they are hearing instructions when there is no obvious source,  but there is no public domain evidence to suggest that the idea has left the lab, but in principle it should work.)

    Then there is also quite a bit of evidence for sensing ultrasound without inter-modulation though bone vibrations stimulating other nerves not normally associated with hearing.

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378595505000481

    This leads to sensations, rather than actually 'hearing' but may be part of the 'feel' of music.

    Mike.

  • Fujimoto may be doing clever things electronically, but the fact is that the tones which were presented to the ear(s) were from 125 Hz to 8 kHz - see fig. 2.

    The bone vibrators stimulate the cochlear nerve in the usual way. Ever tried listening to a tuning fork by biting the foot?