Advice on compliance with regulations for new kitchen and general wiring question

Hi all, a couple of things:

1. We are looking at getting a new kitchen - live in old house with COB/brick/thatch construction for info. The kitchen fitter sent his electrician a pic of the current Consumer Unit which is a Wylex split load RCD, plastic case and he wants to replace it. The house wiring contains a mix of old and new wiring colours, but I had an EICR about a year ago to comply with my insurance requirements and it passed OK. Is there any good reason for requiring a change? He said something, via the kitchen fitter, along the lines of conforming with current regulations back to the fuse box. Is this really the case as I didn't think so from what I've read? I'm a chartered engineer, but only work on low voltage stuff so need to check what the situation is with people familiar with the regulations working on this day in, day out before I start querying this if it goes ahead.

2. One of the circuits has a 10A MCB feeding a junction box just below the CU which feeds through to some outside lights (old halogens no longer working via armoured cable outside) and a 13a socket just below the CU. The location of socket means it's really just used to plug in the hoover. Where does this stand with regard to the regulations? i.e. a 10A limited MCB feeding a 13A socket and outside lights? For info, I am intending to replace the old halogens with newer LED types so hardly any current there, but looking more closely at it I came to notice this. 

Thanks, James.

Parents

  • Really helpful replies here thanks guys and it seems with a lot of these kind of things, many people have a slightly different interpretation. I'll try and attach a pic here. Hopefully, this will show it's a 'proper' TN-C-S installation now and not a 'homebrew' effort that gkenyon alludes to. The plastic CU cover has a manufacture date of '09 so I assume it would suggest 17th edition.

    The point raised by Chris about project creep is my big concern that a CU change will then need to be tested and I don't want to get into issues with sign off if they start saying I won't sign off as I don't like this or that and it ends up a long way in a different direction to just making the changes to the existing circuits for the new kitchen.

    If I look at my copy of the Electrician's guide to the building regulations (17th Edition) it states that there is no particular requirement to ensure compliance with the building regs with respect to other part  of the building not affect by the addition. Is this still the case?

    The wiring is all PVC - combination of old and current colours along with some pyro and armoured cables to an outbuilding.

    I guess my next question is that if there are no new appliances being installed (no increased load) and the existing ones are in more or less the same place the new wiring will reflect a move of the socket positions and these subtle changes. If that is the case, would there be a requirement to run a new cable right the way back to the CU, but not necessarily replace the CU?

    Thanks, James.

  • I'll try and attach a pic here

    To be fair, if I saw that, I'd be saying that needs sorting out. It's a mess, just a couple of hours would get the cables clipped, sort out the mismatched circuit breaker heights (how does the front fit on?) and make sure there were no holes on the top bigger than required. I can see why a new CU has been recommended, a new CU really would be a benefit with so many circuits on the RCDs.

Reply
  • I'll try and attach a pic here

    To be fair, if I saw that, I'd be saying that needs sorting out. It's a mess, just a couple of hours would get the cables clipped, sort out the mismatched circuit breaker heights (how does the front fit on?) and make sure there were no holes on the top bigger than required. I can see why a new CU has been recommended, a new CU really would be a benefit with so many circuits on the RCDs.

Children
No Data