Checking if 1.0mm cpc on 2.5mm cable is acceptable for EICR and where the limit is

Just want to check my calculations and conclusions are correct.
(been meaning to do this for a while)

Checking if a 2.5/1.0mm cpc is acceptable on a 32A  ring final for an EICR.

In this example looking at data for MK 32 A MCB MK data sheet

In the graphs I am assuming the horizontal is PSCC/PFC. In my example I have a PFC of 700A, therefore I2T = about 5000 A/sec

Energy withstand for 1.0cpc  K2S2 = 115*115 * 1.0 = 13,225

I2t needs to be less than K2S2

5000 < 13,225  therefore I am ok.

If I look at the graph and find I2t of 13,000 it looks like I am ok for pscc/pfc  up to about 3K, bit difficult to read with linear graduation on a log scale.

In reality the B type actually switches in 10msec with 5 * rated current rather than the 100msec typically used in calculations.


Parents
  • The fault could be on a spur or very close to the consumer unit so one section of cable could take the brunt of the force.

    These circuits were installed back in the 1970’s and the majority of them were protected by BS3036 re-wirable semi-enclosed fuses, the fuses and the 2.5/1.0 T&E were were only suitable if the faults were severely restricted.

    The 2.5/1.0 mm might be okay with TT earthing, but may require replacing if the earthing arrangement is changed to TN.

    electrical.theiet.org/.../semi-enclosed-fuses.pdf

Reply
  • The fault could be on a spur or very close to the consumer unit so one section of cable could take the brunt of the force.

    These circuits were installed back in the 1970’s and the majority of them were protected by BS3036 re-wirable semi-enclosed fuses, the fuses and the 2.5/1.0 T&E were were only suitable if the faults were severely restricted.

    The 2.5/1.0 mm might be okay with TT earthing, but may require replacing if the earthing arrangement is changed to TN.

    electrical.theiet.org/.../semi-enclosed-fuses.pdf

Children
No Data